IETF Logo Mail Archive

[bmwg] Feedback on the IPv6 and MPLS SR drafts - to consolidate or not?

"sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net> Mon, 07 August 2023 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7979FC151066 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=encrypted.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_AaEGe7TVZu for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xyz.hosed.org (xyz.hosed.org [71.114.67.91]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C6D8C13AE37 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A2919C3420 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 14:51:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xyz.hosed.org
Received: from xyz.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xyz.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R1QEOxNW6Apc for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 14:51:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-71-250-98.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.71.250.98]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6393C19C11DB for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 14:51:33 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=encrypted.net; s=default; t=1691434293; bh=Jur6v+3uS9pPmyXAkOauPOZlH4KoB93zrf+sn9MVFCs=; h=From:Subject:References:To:Date:From; b=CGOqLvAwsyFQlXWjNtblRrtMuKb0PJAGxJsGuWsgM9nJfigFPJjClQAjOMl6d15RB giWUL5zWs/Vp9/d0CKUZTjma6flV5h/qbVSurOYbfV/izMjKTOU+lMBvt14edySsEY mWNZV42We1iwUsr3gFVceJx0Nz0HDU4dO5q+ztb4=
From: "sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
Message-Id: <46FA6F0C-D40B-4867-8840-8C46461A7661@encrypted.net>
References: <e96d1651-f6e3-37de-bf1d-9232983dbb8e@hit.bme.hu>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 11:51:22 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/5Jy7i2oL-5eCvK4yzYNKVpwsXac>
Subject: [bmwg] Feedback on the IPv6 and MPLS SR drafts - to consolidate or not?
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 18:51:38 -0000

Good afternoon BMWG,
	At IETF 117 in San Francisco, we had a discussion around whether or not to consolidate the IPv6 and MPLS SR drafts - they’re currently separate. We, as a group, took an action to continue that conversation on the list, prior to calling for the adoption of either 1 (consolidated) or both drafts. To that end, I’d like to ask BMWG for their opinions here. Gabor has already weighed in (thank you Gabor!). What say the rest of us?

Thank you,

Sarah
BMWG Co-Chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email