IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Request To Review draft-vfv-bmwg-srv6-bench-meth-06

"sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net> Thu, 06 July 2023 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C56C135DFB for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 12:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=encrypted.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMszFMV6_9IU for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 12:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xyz.hosed.org (xyz.hosed.org [71.114.67.91]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323DAC13AE5B for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 12:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EE219C2235 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:39:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xyz.hosed.org
Received: from xyz.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xyz.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZO0ubU87GKF for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:39:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-71-250-98.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.71.250.98]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D31719C16F8 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:39:29 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=encrypted.net; s=default; t=1688672369; bh=jis/SeMFCMPpWRfzm5ZrEZ+XQ8+RDSSjA90V0hadmMk=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=QBNqh6Yr0xahvnkU8ItjIpG1PWPGk3uq4LDocnWEJqxS8LLBoME/RQJdfh0zlGIeZ ARThe9S74p+rGAtxrNlMNf/9kUNOYoFYwcLTMaRkOtYqmQcBuSMceV78gxbpqgW4ap mmbmrKuEFgupAsjge5BSeFlUV3Jf5+BeTmC4R+vs=
From: "sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 12:39:18 -0700
References: <CH0PR02MB7980F704447663D54D5BC514D3469@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR02MB7980F704447663D54D5BC514D3469@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Message-Id: <9E361251-CB71-42E0-918D-8A0148771116@encrypted.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/Y63R5QxPi_TWZUzIVa_-vbEhh4A>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Request To Review draft-vfv-bmwg-srv6-bench-meth-06
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 19:39:35 -0000

Hi BMWG,
	Following up on the request here, I’d like to ask other folks to volunteer and review this document, and share your feedback with the list.

Thank you,
Sarah

> On May 25, 2023, at 9:22 AM, MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
> 
> BWMG,
> 
> This is a request for volunteers to review 
> Benchmarking Methodology for IPv6 Segment Routing
> draft-vfv-bmwg-srv6-bench-meth-06
> 
> This call for reviewers may lead to a call for WG adoption of the draft.
> 
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vfv-bmwg-srv6-bench-meth/
> 
> Please reply with your intent to review the draft, and then follow-up with your review posted to the bmwg list.
> 
> Thanks for your contributions to BMWG,
> Al
> bmwg co-chair
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email