Re: [bmwg] Request To Review draft-vfv-bmwg-srv6-bench-meth-06

Dear Sarah and Authors,

I have already reviewed version 05 of this draft and I wrote my 
comments/recommendations to the list on March 12, 9:04 PM (CET).

Two of them (the scope selection in the Introduction and the omission of 
BGP in Section 3.2) were addressed by Eduard on the list the next day.

Now I have validated the updates of version 06 against my 
recommendations and I found that the rest of my recommendations have 
been incorporated.

So I am satisfied with the update and I think that the document is 
useful and I support its adoption.

I am also aware that by writing this I make an implicit promise to read 
it again later at least one more time e.g., at WGLC if not before. :-)

Best regards,

Gábor

7/6/2023 9:39 PM keltezéssel, sbanks@encrypted.net írta:
> Hi BMWG,
> 	Following up on the request here, I’d like to ask other folks to volunteer and review this document, and share your feedback with the list.
>
> Thank you,
> Sarah
>
>> On May 25, 2023, at 9:22 AM, MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>>
>> BWMG,
>>
>> This is a request for volunteers to review
>> Benchmarking Methodology for IPv6 Segment Routing
>> draft-vfv-bmwg-srv6-bench-meth-06
>>
>> This call for reviewers may lead to a call for WG adoption of the draft.
>>
>> The draft is available here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vfv-bmwg-srv6-bench-meth/
>>
>> Please reply with your intent to review the draft, and then follow-up with your review posted to the bmwg list.
>>
>> Thanks for your contributions to BMWG,
>> Al
>> bmwg co-chair
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bmwg mailing list
>> bmwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>