IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-04

"Jan Novak (janovak)" <janovak@cisco.com> Sun, 02 October 2011 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <janovak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976B221F84CE for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.068
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.068 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.531, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HNJdl8iY-vWR for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B0321F84CC for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=janovak@cisco.com; l=19610; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1317579698; x=1318789298; h=mime-version:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:from:to:cc; bh=/uoEVI1vwRxC2pkKVAf8vMzttROBAXTQacff4hQOKls=; b=bREd/p6BJhn6xbAwSJ2yK6D/BX6CBzw6GteOChtRzdLbAtBr2dd1ofoi Ru1D4roIigDtaYljMFkK388Y6H1adGANedzNmYVWKrrG46HtFqSF3+qpa fLH8ewtej8TYGX0sqKXkHu3r+f3eh2AaJHLyv8jPiGJehUwocAMjT9gLg g=;
X-Files: answers-LC02.txt : 12958
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.68,477,1312156800"; d="txt'?scan'208"; a="56928143"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2011 18:21:37 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-101.cisco.com (xbh-ams-101.cisco.com [144.254.74.71]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p92ILbF4029086; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 18:21:37 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-212.cisco.com ([144.254.75.23]) by xbh-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 2 Oct 2011 20:21:37 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC8130.1F730A7D"
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:21:35 +0200
Message-ID: <C95CC96B171AF24CA1BB6CA3C52D0BA0010DB49A@XMB-AMS-212.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E6A0E03.3060807@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-04
Thread-Index: Acxu8IO6DLQZWOgkTCWugo/pPFbxFASPkpyw
References: <4DF60A70.4070902@cisco.com> <4DFF103A.1000209@cisco.com> <C95CC96B171AF24CA1BB6CA3C52D0BA0A3F270@XMB-AMS-212.cisco.com> <4E6A0E03.3060807@cisco.com>
From: "Jan Novak (janovak)" <janovak@cisco.com>
To: "Paul Aitken (paitken)" <paitken@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2011 18:21:37.0927 (UTC) FILETIME=[1FD38170:01CC8130]
Cc: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-04
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:18:40 -0000

Hi Paul,

Thanks for your review again.

> I look forward to seeing a -04.

I have just posted the corrected version:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-04.txt

Please note, it is not enough to read just the draft
- in some cases your comments did not result
in any text changes (mostly because what you suggest
is covered elsewhere or I considered better to place
your proposed  changed elsewhere than where you 
"positioned" your comment). But it does not mean
I ignored any of your comments.
 
I have therefore attached a file with all the explanations
to your review containing also reference to my 
earlier posting to the mailing list on the 22nd of June
answering already some issues. I would appreciate
if you could take these answers into account when
judging if your comments were answered. I will also make
sure you see the answers - I regret and apologize for
the situation, when you missed the importance of those.

I will also paste my answers in a next mail just in case
 your mail client couldn't decode the attachment.

I look forward for your answers where I wasn't quite sure
what you expected from me and needed to ask you a question 
about it ....

Rgds, Jan




The climate of Edinburgh is such that the weak succumb young .... 
and the strong envy them.
                                 Dr. Johnson


P.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email