IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-16: (with COMMENT)

Lucien <lucien.avramov@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <lucien.avramov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B23129488; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kkfMN-9QYGKJ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F1E129480; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 63so67845057ywr.0; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vWEB0BHSmhOhdTwnpXllfvKaHPMNydEga6fNsIJBoyw=; b=TsEkBmR6Ihfd92Hoo8cTR/kZvZQ/lX3/9ZRdMwXgTNyzVlUsZUI+Fdau9+OD3AmEzW yMzekJ5IxuWl2MPWSpkplmJzpWQX54dw33F62lJwyXwFLKnyiAJzRV6jChDov2QiqXKt gQICa9Y70Uc00679gT4LkvnMJMbba9kbmxUa69luguwzMmvFT5MCxxwtM4ploVmHEY0Z n3CrHTtWxOIpainXmA5LJOX3CFFAat1CQHXrdPLsXJV/1HNKTaZk6zvfeXeoEyVQKVLJ QWwS9GnTCmAaXs78qfWcVbNUU9OttpDdzzI1hDy3GHfOKMF5HccswvCO5sztJOYqBd9l xsrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vWEB0BHSmhOhdTwnpXllfvKaHPMNydEga6fNsIJBoyw=; b=bau9LENjp9hWsZeZj4Auw1PrrEVxpar41qiVrGN3Mdb8J0LTvJLDGXGt99X/yGqUOR cQJA1IzwoR25gYOUM5ZAKsNDO+DJzbm0HUCAK8IoTiOXuLlUSo04rgPnGllw8BW5fGtT gIEPTqkggngvuvh6MyKijH8YHW/LZpQqnm9irdRKr5MDy3UPkiQ/mynecCekI23+IGTE /8rAy5KYSfcndKDAA8E2ej1u8RANiKwxKYa1Fhdk7i+kKyYhSCzcColSCXJtLOamdxQx 1n+6ohif6h0BRz3TG8w8/kyYRAGL43QUbNSV49AgwY1pSn2X+a/zIDypvVMWvc07miJv b5QA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwzJgImFfvvynleeFdA0Yp032nVMmr3Y1ScM42KkySouISH1NXy rRntIZ7MLJin/CgW6fkKdYSoLMEnww==
X-Received: by 10.129.80.193 with SMTP id e184mr29166326ywb.44.1498070545497; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.145.2 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAArZqeX9vVNS0iawMeV9-U5ZD5c1OA-eLjHCzPz0kKrRDsBRUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <149806880921.15906.12225670606905404415.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAArZqeX9vVNS0iawMeV9-U5ZD5c1OA-eLjHCzPz0kKrRDsBRUg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucien <lucien.avramov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:42:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAArZqeVNE9pnva8xf9XoOEUHAWBn60+xvgCDbzHvQD55EmN+FQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology@ietf.org, Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147e4e2b690dd05527cba2d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/WAE68A_4uKzGJdEfXn1WQCrOpf8>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:42:28 -0000

I meant to say the delta of power when the data center switch is iddle and
at 100% of capacity is marginal.

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Lucien <lucien.avramov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Suresh,
>
> We actually have talked about this in the beginning, and this is not in
> the scope of the networking metrics we are after for performance. The
> amount of power a data center switch uses at no use or at 100% load is
> marginal.
>
> Cheers,
> Lucien
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Suresh Krishnan <
> suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-16: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Not sure if the WG discussed this, but it would have been interesting to
>> have
>> some energy efficiency related metrics as the draft is datacenter focused
>> and
>> energy efficiency is an important consideration in datacenters.
>>
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email