IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-16: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Thu, 22 June 2017 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B01126D45; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 05:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5CKRIme8-Xh7; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 05:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D09128BA2; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 05:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id v20so9987804qtg.1; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 05:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TbspT24DZs2S42RwAkakXRmUT4Ggix77a2CP8TbK/wg=; b=LjuQB1xuxI8EKRR5P4su5ORnR2/poNODUicIUbxwbQGPx1rGwwNtNEVurkyGVah4uX n/hODpML2r8Diw9n3zV4ptFaZVb3Dcq3Hx07abtGmgKJFo6GQquywWG2ilum6LIf73Xr NmDEb9Lbj2Q61eE6OZja4Ct+zO/FjXFLVKDZEdqzdY0OVoYOoc3hIKfT0JMtcRltthTU 9KGTzA16dY8tsO5lI4XiQHQPX5JiCyl56wLJ/UY7m8m0lJa3qZis3f2tnrYSISAXL8a3 3zZBGOv7KYXUtjNi9ilo4WlmuiZTGqZXMalmYgtLEgzmBCefHQlvA6U+DxlXlgv6Xt39 n+Ag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TbspT24DZs2S42RwAkakXRmUT4Ggix77a2CP8TbK/wg=; b=Ss06KlL6Suc9q7lYdLpJ1k/y8VxV78Rl9ei1Qd5VSIuQgfZMUug1DOJZhjOP5zXKnn MTfpW14+163RLDBkXPLspTjerQh7g4BLDlfyO0K8GE/s7y4kiRLceSE2pPyDxC+dfdXo Baw9hlEdHeCb4DSDNVrefDaDI3TJDBCEzXkGHFX2GSD0HKZ1ycZCG++49EguczDQ9PyA TbvSTgN+se1LqulBVzbe/BL1pNH1WAz8GI0KKfHC81acLovTq9aLeVF0VPZaXlW1mlj6 n7x0jGdePMHWogID91Y5pFW2S6nCC8fhzzPFLEst2G+IoCWMYQKw3vnTRIGT9h/bq7vG pBWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz/HvWbhIcr/8NDw9u7uhx95b8NhaWx3hX/IUpgWgxRoBIKaBn+ CLFVWMmPk3Ge+SOtM5z7ulOKQp8Hfw==
X-Received: by 10.237.35.178 with SMTP id j47mr2566502qtc.215.1498133728223; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 05:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.159.211 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 05:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF25FE2F16@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <149806880921.15906.12225670606905404415.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF25FE2F16@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:45:27 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+MHpBpajfNwpAsRbY4aoBpTY9OYO5dmYmuqsOV7d1EexG55nQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology@ietf.org>, "bmwg-chairs@ietf.org" <bmwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/pv-R9YZJ0GSIHn5Uuu4J2jKtXQo>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:15:31 -0000

Hi Al,

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:12 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
<acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krishnan@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 2:13 PM
> ...
>>
>> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-16: No Objection
>>
> ...
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Not sure if the WG discussed this, but it would have been interesting to
>> have
>> some energy efficiency related metrics as the draft is datacenter
>> focused and
>> energy efficiency is an important consideration in datacenters.
>>
> [ACM]
> Hi Suresh,
>
> We had a draft/proposed WI on this topic, but we couldn't find sufficient
> support and expertise to review and complete a high quality
> document, so the proponents moved-on.

Thanks. It is unfortunate, but it certainly clarifies things for me.

>
> I agree, it's an important area to consider if the expertise
> can be gathered in BMWG.

Great.

Regards
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email