IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] WG ADOPTION: draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking (terms and meth)

Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 October 2015 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB421A3BA0 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QhalkMrVcpek for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DCA61A6EEC for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgeb31 with SMTP id b31so20162179qge.0 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Dm8ydFk+I+WwEqEL7mYWV2wKJlHN9HnkmhuepOOsFhM=; b=zhmvbO5PQTgE3k/+j721XJ00DTOL8fcD9BJpsPCGIXyJaF6zaAkpjsn7Ovi2mW9m0t qZuYDl6E+3IJySI/F/jrJr+sBoLhle9QRiKOZ/tQk829Zr+2xcY74hFdMgMpj0E3hFJP tTnvyKvPEau5tOQMc+GmMWeCopzDX+6Uj5au1hvAffxSa74pbeDtPxSxBJ0O6yUxlbzt VM8dxCA3u3hx2cg3tQ5qmCODBBxFp9qHJoGxJSLTeIIUQgFt4PiJbNw9HuWkZS5K8EC0 Hcjt2tsbcn4JthMtxSGvQ4/t6oAlJbZQx4O/RTmRBqbxJgnZHQj99WN58kDabc5zd5o6 ImLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.97.136 with SMTP id m8mr32428803qge.74.1444661900611; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.94.80 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.94.80 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <79E8E355-10D6-41CB-8F3B-97D305A3C915@vmware.com>
References: <79E8E355-10D6-41CB-8F3B-97D305A3C915@vmware.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:58:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOyVPHQCZEyx5oZey8aXvQUoyi8xkqTzK=RQnMNfLq2TH3rOcA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Jacob Rapp <jrapp@vmware.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a5d5268143f0521e98ff3"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/WN7HsUyCy-cOdNcIYySk5OKthQE>
Cc: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG ADOPTION: draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking (terms and meth)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:58:23 -0000

Al,

I support the effort.

Jacob, I think we may need to further sharpen the term SDN Controller - I
however agree with Al we don't want to be focused on OF only

Thanks,
Vishwas
On Oct 12, 2015 7:29 AM, "Jacob Rapp" <jrapp@vmware.com> wrote:

> As I mentioned during the meetings, I still do not agree with the use of
> “SDN Controller” here. SDN is a broad term and the drafts seem to be
> focused on OpenFlow controllers. If there is a more concise definition, why
> not use it (OpenFlow vs. SDN)?
>
> —
> Jacob
>
>
>
> On 9/22/15, 10:08 PM, "bmwg on behalf of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <
> bmwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>
> >BMWG,
> >
> >According to our minutes of IETF-93:
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_proceedings_93_minutes_minutes-2D93-2Dbmwg&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=yHLFC_S7xKVwxUTrxkgAO2Wv6TERINPx3asK-NV5mes&e=
> >
> >those present expressed support to adopt:
> >
> >Benchmarking Terminology and Methodology for SDN Controller Performance
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbhuvan-2Dbmwg-2Dsdn-2Dcontroller-2Dbenchmark-2Dterm-2D00&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=rNtr6etgVTlWeAJHy5326lR9hl3-6rAyfu95MVs8UPI&e=
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbhuvan-2Dbmwg-2Dof-2Dcontroller-2Dbenchmarking-2D01&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=4Xz1K2D3X45eEIjJF3HXEGwLlR2UB8-mrrWG8dsdA7k&e=
> >
> >as a chartered work item.
> >
> >We now seek to confirm that support on the mailing list.
> >
> >Please reply with your opinion whether the BMWG should adopt
> >these drafts, whether you have read the drafts, and any comments
> >on the drafts or this call for adoption.
> >
> >Deadline: October 13, 2015
> >
> >thanks for your attention,
> >Al
> >bmwg co-chair
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >bmwg mailing list
> >bmwg@ietf.org
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bmwg&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=-3y2976SCSn9LYAEU6lrZ_ZMDeocMmZ3ByRSBw5qFSw&e=
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email