IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance - Updated Draft Version

"Marius Georgescu" <liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp> Sat, 01 August 2015 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A641B2B56 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 01:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.199
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7RBzY8b1qIW for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 01:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailrelay22.naist.jp (mailrelay22.naist.jp [163.221.80.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375431B2B55 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 01:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpost22.naist.jp (mailscan22.naist.jp [163.221.80.59]) by mailrelay22.naist.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5FB66A for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 17:14:21 +0900 (JST)
Received: from aslim (dn158-103.naist.jp [163.221.158.103]) by mailpost22.naist.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892E6669 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 17:14:21 +0900 (JST)
From: Marius Georgescu <liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
References: <007301d0c3a7$9a13fba0$ce3bf2e0$@veryxtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <007301d0c3a7$9a13fba0$ce3bf2e0$@veryxtech.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 17:17:20 +0900
Message-ID: <000001d0cc32$7c8f1f90$75ad5eb0$@is.naist.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01D0CC7D.EC787540"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQJu+aLp35MXVPA9pBpjm1ci9f/zyJy6cWQQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-TM-AS-MML: No
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1392-8.0.0.1202-21716.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--30.758-5.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--30.758-5.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: LO70BQix4aVjyIn1sobvhavnfoenSIXeGTjBw3zlEi5B8bDujnQ94ZOb xJgN/hOxZodCyXXZLewM74Nf6tTB9qJ5XQI/tsXlc0FWRr6hdRj80wK+80FbY/XMgia2I+bV2os 3ueKAsFSGtSG8aCufnvinuiiBoX+l5QINykU/acVaACmB8L3480lPe/W3FiER8+0KUSz2xPplI0 vGyCjKvzIaJpKzSfrsYe1mzp7dkwdWFsMQfbcNE38OykjWMPVZl8Q/C1Ls0kwEslm6FxDbp4Fhp hRl/QgVEtdrY/Wb3fPe+kkFSr2zgBxJEX0k/k7OLiNvWfV40DeXavS2BPdgFGoP2Q08Uz0YNs3S 39zaoXa7hCgQPuZVUeKYpwtG+wHV8FhGjTp5WPfy/MPf/RmXSoVtgQyPvRbMizFhECDuofD4pTO 56aJ0/F2W8a6r9Ast+5+93dPb6/dR/8wLhm7apG7qs9K13Fogf7I+P8ORpcmc0H8AUS5IGRz2MD iYujy5pfVcx39Kq+4QHQ+7AkbTsZm3CkZsyRGFwmm5gw944w9ac+Ivjg/KI4IiDu0n/+6xi+m1D DPm2yLBIlxtEe6gx9EKgdVAc8zGFDL4bOL9B341C2f8ND2KYEjtkIPHR1Vbmvyr8NorYSrpoPGD A2CxtCHmjNSy4BIir10pknZXGJrJ4y0wP1A6ANjQedTOgaIMRppJy6S9vAdnPQAAZZiCotRl/9e 5ZeBrKEsgau+EjwpJV3La6JhRYn0HWGQsxMPXG6/iG2fKoF+mZy14mNSMpC0NvUIczEarsw/9as 2SGD9k3xWMXX/FFw==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/jYikhR8olNliu6VXu40GNoiyQ5g>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance - Updated Draft Version
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 08:14:25 -0000

Dear Bhuvan et alia,

 

Please find attached my inline suggestions for the new draft. They were
marked with ###MG .

Thank you for taking care of so many comments.  

 

Best regards,

Marius 

 

 

From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bhuvan (Veryx
Technologies)
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 8:23 PM
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Cc: 'Anton Basil' <anton.basil@veryxtech.com>; Tassinari, Mark A
<mark.tassinari@hp.com>; vishwas.manral <vishwas.manral@gmail.com>
Subject: [bmwg] Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance -
Updated Draft Version

 

Dear BMWG Members,

 

We have updated the draft
(draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-00
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-
00> ) about SDN Controller benchmarking addressing comments received in
IETF-92 meeting. Thank you very much for providing your valuable comments.
The latest draft can be found in
draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-01
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-
01> 

 

Summary of Changes:

a.      Updated test setup diagram following the comment from Scott Bradner.

b.      Added recommendations for test topology, test iterations etc., to
use for benchmarking.

c.      Provided reference test topologies.

d.      Split Path Provisioning tests into two different tests - Proactive
and Reactive Path Provisioning tests.

e.      Provided more clarity on test procedure for some of the tests.

f.       Fixed IETF normative language usage.

 

We would love to hear any comments and queries on the same.

 

Thanks,

Authors

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email