IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance - Updated Draft Version

Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net> Sun, 02 August 2015 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F811A8A80 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJInr9HAm4we for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from firefly.encrypted.net (firefly.encrypted.net [72.13.81.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B821A8A71 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from firefly.encrypted.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firefly.encrypted.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7441334145; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at encrypted.net
Received: from firefly.encrypted.net ([127.0.0.1]) by firefly.encrypted.net (firefly.encrypted.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5v01ZFQlE9sZ; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (c-67-164-24-91.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.164.24.91]) by firefly.encrypted.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DF8F34141; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3F9214C7-2FBF-48A7-84C0-EC921BDB57DF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
In-Reply-To: <000001d0cc32$7c8f1f90$75ad5eb0$@is.naist.jp>
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 21:08:21 -0700
Message-Id: <8703B772-E5CA-4933-8799-8B653FBBB31E@encrypted.net>
References: <007301d0c3a7$9a13fba0$ce3bf2e0$@veryxtech.com> <000001d0cc32$7c8f1f90$75ad5eb0$@is.naist.jp>
To: Marius Georgescu <liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/qv3Z0OVWIYC01WDDwz3HKl32qfY>
Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance - Updated Draft Version
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 04:08:32 -0000

Thank you Marius, for your time and inline suggestions. We'll review and touch base soon.

Thanks
Sarah

> On Aug 1, 2015, at 1:17 AM, Marius Georgescu <liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp> wrote:
> 
> Dear Bhuvan et alia,
>  
> Please find attached my inline suggestions for the new draft. They were marked with ###MG .
> Thank you for taking care of so many comments.  
>  
> Best regards,
> Marius 
>  
>   <>
> From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Bhuvan (Veryx Technologies)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 8:23 PM
> To: bmwg@ietf.org <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
> Cc: 'Anton Basil' <anton.basil@veryxtech.com <mailto:anton.basil@veryxtech.com>>; Tassinari, Mark A <mark.tassinari@hp.com <mailto:mark.tassinari@hp.com>>; vishwas.manral <vishwas.manral@gmail.com <mailto:vishwas.manral@gmail.com>>
> Subject: [bmwg] Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance - Updated Draft Version
>  
> Dear BMWG Members,
>  
> We have updated the draft (draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-00 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-00>) about SDN Controller benchmarking addressing comments received in IETF-92 meeting. Thank you very much for providing your valuable comments. The latest draft can be found in draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-01 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-01>
>  
> Summary of Changes:
> a.      Updated test setup diagram following the comment from Scott Bradner.
> b.      Added recommendations for test topology, test iterations etc., to use for benchmarking.
> c.      Provided reference test topologies.
> d.      Split Path Provisioning tests into two different tests - Proactive and Reactive Path Provisioning tests.
> e.      Provided more clarity on test procedure for some of the tests.
> f.       Fixed IETF normative language usage.
>  
> We would love to hear any comments and queries on the same.
>  
> Thanks,
> Authors
> <draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-01 MG.TXT>_______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email