[bmwg] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289BF127136; Wed, 9 May 2018 11:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152589161812.3989.679087827730128314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 11:46:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/kHcxbPDosleYVfibxWK1WZP5qmQ>
Subject: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 18:46:58 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bmwg/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am ok with no external review for this charter.

I would love to see something in the charter about interaction with existing
WGs (as applicable), specially for the cases where documents are being produced
for IETF technology.  I see EVPN in the list of milestones, for example; it
would be great if the bess WG was at least informed/made aware/given a heads
up, etc. on the work.  I don't think there's a need to list the WGs, but a
generic sentence such as "consult with/inform other WGs as appropriate" would
be great!