Re: [bmwg] draft-green-bmwg-seceff-bench-meth-00

Kenneth Green <KGreen@ixiacom.com> Thu, 27 October 2011 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <KGreen@ixiacom.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CB911E808E for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.348
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.749, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clhP7wfkQE91 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB8811E8073 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail22-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.251) by CH1EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.43.70.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:32:50 +0000
Received: from mail22-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail22-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0648620487; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -34
X-BigFish: PS-34(zzbb2dK9371K542M98dKzz1202hzz1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h944h)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.55.61.13; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPVD:NLI; H:CH1PRD0604HT002.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-FB-SS: 13,
Received-SPF: pass (mail22-ch1: domain of ixiacom.com designates 157.55.61.13 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.55.61.13; envelope-from=KGreen@ixiacom.com; helo=CH1PRD0604HT002.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail22-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail22-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1319751127791585_29181; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:32:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.254]) by mail22-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B002070804F; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:32:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1PRD0604HT002.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (157.55.61.13) by CH1EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (10.43.70.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:32:08 +0000
Received: from CH1PRD0604MB113.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.2.105]) by CH1PRD0604HT002.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.42.111.209]) with mapi id 14.15.0003.000; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:32:07 +0000
From: Kenneth Green <KGreen@ixiacom.com>
To: David Newman <dnewman@networktest.com>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] draft-green-bmwg-seceff-bench-meth-00
Thread-Index: AcySvqGwCJ5Y0rbNQRKjBrQFDORCwQB4GuAgAAdfxQAACBSBgAAEjnhQ
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:32:07 +0000
Message-ID: <D9D031B5F8793F4292136C1E841B62FD02193C@CH1PRD0604MB113.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <D9D031B5F8793F4292136C1E841B62FD0132CD@CH1PRD0604MB113.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <C95CC96B171AF24CA1BB6CA3C52D0BA0012BEA6C@XMB-AMS-212.cisco.com> <D9D031B5F8793F4292136C1E841B62FD0216E3@CH1PRD0604MB113.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <4EA9ADF3.80304@networktest.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA9ADF3.80304@networktest.com>
Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.27.84.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossPremises-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossPremises-AuthMechanism: 04
X-MS-Exchange-CrossPremises-AuthSource: CH1PRD0604HT002.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossPremises-SCL: -1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossPremises-messagesource: StoreDriver
X-MS-Exchange-CrossPremises-BCC:
X-MS-Exchange-CrossPremises-processed-by-journaling: Journal Agent
X-MS-Exchange-CrossPremises-ContentConversionOptions: False; 00160000; True; ; iso-8859-1
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: CH1PRD0604HT002.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
X-OriginatorOrg: ixiacom.com
Subject: Re: [bmwg] draft-green-bmwg-seceff-bench-meth-00
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:32:59 -0000

Thank you for this very appropriate pointer David,  it is great to be able to be able to benefit from the collective wisdom of this talented group.

I will review and make appropriate reference to RFC2647.

Regards,
Kenneth

Kenneth Green
Solution Architect
Ixia


-----Original Message-----
From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Newman
Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 6:16 AM
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] draft-green-bmwg-seceff-bench-meth-00

On 10/27/11 8:33 AM, Kenneth Green wrote:
> Good suggestion Jan, thank you. We will certainly need to flesh out 
> the terminology and indeed, publish an associated terminology draft.

RFC 2647 defines "illegal traffic" and "rejected traffic" as, respectively, anything prohibited by a rule set and anything a rule set drops.

This isn't anywhere near as detailed as what you're going for here with separate definitions for DDoS, malware, etc., but it would be a useful starting point in considering what a DUT/SUT should and should not forward. Oh, and both definitions already cover the whole flow/transaction set...

dn

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg