IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] draft-green-bmwg-seceff-bench-meth-00

David Newman <dnewman@networktest.com> Thu, 27 October 2011 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <dnewman@networktest.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A57C21F8B74 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hFbizEc1UhNH for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.networktest.com (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1819E21F8B6F for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [69.55.234.104]) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD6C2560D9 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.networktest.com ([69.55.234.104]) by localhost (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44456-08 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp207.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [205.147.16.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C4F72560D4 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4EA9ADF3.80304@networktest.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:16:03 -0700
From: David Newman <dnewman@networktest.com>
Organization: Network Test Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bmwg@ietf.org
References: <D9D031B5F8793F4292136C1E841B62FD0132CD@CH1PRD0604MB113.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <C95CC96B171AF24CA1BB6CA3C52D0BA0012BEA6C@XMB-AMS-212.cisco.com> <D9D031B5F8793F4292136C1E841B62FD0216E3@CH1PRD0604MB113.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9D031B5F8793F4292136C1E841B62FD0216E3@CH1PRD0604MB113.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [bmwg] draft-green-bmwg-seceff-bench-meth-00
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:16:06 -0000

On 10/27/11 8:33 AM, Kenneth Green wrote:
> Good suggestion Jan, thank you. We will certainly need to flesh out the
> terminology and indeed, publish an associated terminology draft.

RFC 2647 defines "illegal traffic" and "rejected traffic" as,
respectively, anything prohibited by a rule set and anything a rule set
drops.

This isn't anywhere near as detailed as what you're going for here with
separate definitions for DDoS, malware, etc., but it would be a useful
starting point in considering what a DUT/SUT should and should not
forward. Oh, and both definitions already cover the whole
flow/transaction set...

dn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email