Re: [bmwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance-15: (with COMMENT)

[[e-mail]]

Murray,

Thanks for updating your status.

I'm not sure how this works, so my apologies if I am suggesting something outside of the norm....

Do you have any problem us addressing your well-founded nits in the version that will be posted as a result of the IETF Editor review?

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 10:28 AM
To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Al Morton <[e-mail]>
Subject: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance-15: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for handling my DISCUSS about all the normative language used here.

Nits not yet mentioned by others:

Section 4.2:

* "... users SHOULD configure their device ..." -- s/device/devices/ (unless
all users share one device)

Section 6.3:

* "The value SHOULD be expressed in millisecond." -- s/millisecond/milliseconds/