Re: [bmwg] bmwg Digest, Vol 227, Issue 1

Sudhin <sudhinjacob@rediffmail.com> Fri, 29 September 2023 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sudhinjacob@rediffmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB8EC15152B for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_MIME_MALF=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rediffmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZD2fouRufyPu for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 07:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rediffmail.com (f4mail-235-140.rediffmail.com [202.137.235.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40353C151089 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 07:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rediffmail.com; s=mail; t=1695998194; bh=jdbp/yMyZTBGeToFOc21yIxGDTyHMKg70JssH5v09UU=; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Content-Type; b=YKWLZT8qzrDHgPhvoDBDywUJmaQ+wAR0Zjz/igpT3PEDFqqyMlnkc21LTH3LoX1je 3ojgrgXKneMup8AjnYpHL5Y6EseMQHzvNO1PFw8IeHSvWbsF8TxPcQjssRxbWybPWD r+jKXAGVdM+RPKeY5iM1fohpJyKa5igx4bAorpag=
Received: (qmail 19147 invoked by uid 510); 29 Sep 2023 14:36:34 -0000
x-m-msg: asd54ad564ad7aa6sd5as6d5; a6da7d6asas6dasd77; 5dad65ad5sd;
X-OUT-VDRT-SpamState: 0\LEGIT
X-OUT-VDRT-SpamScore: -60
X-OUT-VDRT-SpamCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrtddvgdejkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgfffkffhhfdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnefhohhrghgvugcujffvvffrufculdegtddmnecujfgurhepffggvffkjghsuffhvegtsegrtderredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfufhuughhihhnfdcuoehsuhguhhhinhhjrggtohgssehrvgguihhffhhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueekudeuudelheefgeejveduvdekveejgeeihfdvudefgefhieetheejuddtgedtnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdprhgvughifhhfrdgtohhmpdihohhuthhusggvrdgtohhmnecukfhppedutddurddtrdeifedrvdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth
X-Remote-IP: 101.0.63.27
X-REDF-OSEN: sudhinjacob@rediffmail.com
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:36:34 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Received: from unknown 101.0.63.27 by rediffmail.com via HTTP; 29 Sep 2023 14:36:34 -0000
X-Senderscore: D=0&S=0
Message-ID: <1695997454.S.33186.9172.f4-234-164.1695998194.19091@webmail.rediffmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKQeHKksi9iJoRF3K1Np h0w=Ge4NL08rRt3EA-NnFWYg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: sudhinjacob@rediffmail.com
From: Sudhin <sudhinjacob@rediffmail.com>
Cc: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_4ab0aeb2dc1a1e17810c20f6061683e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/v6wtJmSuESwUXI74s3hSp8y93xE>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] bmwg Digest, Vol 227, Issue 1
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:37:13 -0000

Hi Warren,

The comments are addressed in the new version, as I stated in the email due to pandemic and lock down things could not progress. Now we are committed to complete it. Please see the answers inline.

Regards,
Sudhin

From: Warren Kumari &lt;warren@kumari.net&gt;
Sent: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 19:54:14
To: Sudhin &lt;sudhinjacob@rediffmail.com&gt;
Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] bmwg Digest, Vol 227, Issue 1
&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:25 PM, Sudhin &lt;sudhinjacob=40rediffmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org&gt; wrote:
I think there are no opposition, then we need to forward this. We put a lot of effort over a period of time and went through multiple votings. &nbsp;
Due to pandemic there was an halt beyond our control.
&nbsp;Now we are back and overcome the obstacles. It needs to be put back in queue like earlier.
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Only if the WG explicitly supports progressing the document.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
It did not go through &quot;multiple votings&quot; - it had a WGLC, IETF LC and IESG eval.&nbsp;

Sudhin&gt;&gt;&gt; it went through 2 LC before putting to IESG.
&nbsp;
During the IESG eval it received 5 DISCUSS positions (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest/ballot/).&nbsp;
&nbsp;
We tried reaching out to the authors **multiple** times to get an update. A few of these are listed in the Datatracker history (&nbsp;https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest/history/&nbsp; - 2021-08-24,&nbsp;2021-09-15, 2022-01-28), but there were many others as well, including mail from the chairs, asking people who worked at Juniper to poke internally, etc, and multiple emails to the WG:

Sudhin&gt;&gt;&gt; I didnt get any updates(possibly&nbsp;missed) .&nbsp;I informed the WG that mail id got change as I left Juniper.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/bxVZYdOb8WXf1HJ-b7MVApK3_LI/
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/q_QpkXNK2YcNxMqix3EhrY-3O0w/

We even asked in the WG for volunteers to take over:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/q_QpkXNK2YcNxMqix3EhrY-3O0w/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUZKhuqa5BY&amp;t=411s
&nbsp;
The chairs and I repeatedly asked the WG for volunteers to pick up the document and progress it &mdash; but no-one did. This implies that the WG did not strongly want to progress it.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
It has been 800 days (&gt;2years, 2 months) since IESG Eval &mdash; it would need at the minimum another WGLC, IETF LC and IESG Eval&hellip;.
&nbsp;
Without strong evidence of interest from the WG (including strong support during WGLC), and a strong commitment from the authors to quickly and comprehensively address all comments, I cannot progress the document.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
W
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Regards,
Sudhin
&nbsp;
From: bmwg-request@ietf.org
Sent: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:30:06
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: bmwg Digest, Vol 227, Issue 1
&nbsp;
Send bmwg mailing list submissions to
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;bmwg@ietf.org
&nbsp;
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body &#39;help&#39; to
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;bmwg-request@ietf.org
&nbsp;
You can reach the person managing the list at
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;bmwg-owner@ietf.org
&nbsp;
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than &quot;Re: Contents of bmwg digest...&quot;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Today&#39;s Topics:
&nbsp;
&nbsp; 1. Fwd: &nbsp;I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-11.txt
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(sbanks@encrypted.net)
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
----------------------------------------------------------------------
&nbsp;
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:27:00 -0700
From: &quot;sbanks@encrypted.net&quot; &lt;sbanks@encrypted.net&gt;
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: [bmwg] Fwd: &nbsp;I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-11.txt
Message-ID: &lt;81E3536E-9BFE-4BB7-B48A-71BD405BD9CC@encrypted.net&gt;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;
&nbsp;
Hello BMWG,
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;My apologies for the late follow up - I thought I?d sent this note, but cannot find it in my mailbox, so let me circle back.
&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The authors of the EVPN benchmarking work had previously shared an adopted document with the working group. It was marked dead, due to an inability to reach the authors (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/q_QpkXNK2YcNxMqix3EhrY-3O0w/). The authors would like to revive the draft. Given how much time has elapsed since WGLC and IETF LC, our AD would like the working group to review and confirm that it is still work we?d like to support. Please reply to this email with a call for support, or lack of support. Let?s give this period 2 weeks - please indicate support/no support by September 25, 2023.
&nbsp;
Thank you,
Sarah
BMWG Co-Chair
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&gt; Begin forwarded message:
&gt;
&gt; From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
&gt; Subject: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-11.txt
&gt; Date: August 17, 2023 at 1:30:12 AM PDT
&gt; To: &lt;i-d-announce@ietf.org&gt;
&gt; Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
&gt; Reply-To: bmwg@ietf.org
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
&gt; directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Benchmarking
&gt; Methodology (BMWG) WG of the IETF.
&gt;
&gt; &nbsp; Title &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; :&nbsp;Benchmarking Methodology for EVPN and PBB-EVPN
&gt; &nbsp; Authors &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; :&nbsp;Sudhin Jacob
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Kishore Tiruveedhula
&gt; &nbsp; Filename &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-11.txt
&gt; &nbsp; Pages &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; :&nbsp;27
&gt; &nbsp; Date &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;: 2023-08-17
&gt;
&gt; Abstract:
&gt; &nbsp; This document defines methodologies for benchmarking EVPN and PBB-
&gt; &nbsp; EVPN performance.&nbsp; EVPN is defined in RFC 7432, and is being deployed
&gt; &nbsp; in Service Provider networks.&nbsp; Specifically, this document defines
&gt; &nbsp; the methodologies for benchmarking EVPN/PBB-EVPN convergence, data
&gt; &nbsp; plane performance, and control plane performance.
&gt;
&gt; The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
&gt; https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest/
&gt;
&gt; There is also an htmlized version available at:
&gt; https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-11
&gt;
&gt; A diff from the previous version is available at:
&gt; https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-11
&gt;
&gt; Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; bmwg mailing list
&gt; bmwg@ietf.org
&gt; https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
&nbsp;
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: &lt;https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/attachments/20230911/16034d53/attachment.htm&gt;
&nbsp;
------------------------------
&nbsp;
Subject: Digest Footer
&nbsp;
_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
------------------------------
&nbsp;
End of bmwg Digest, Vol 227, Issue 1
************************************
&nbsp;
_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;