RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Sun, 04 January 2004 08:52 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA19527 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:52:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ad3zR-0000er-3r for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 03:52:05 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i048q5IB002528 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:52:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ad3zP-0000eT-Mv; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 03:52:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ad3yz-0000cu-Ih for bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 03:51:37 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA19492 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:51:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ad3yx-0000Ht-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 03:51:35 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ad3x2-0007ma-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 03:49:37 -0500
Received: from tierw.net.avaya.com ([198.152.13.100]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ad3uk-0007Ia-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 03:47:14 -0500
Received: from tierw.net.avaya.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tierw.net.avaya.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i048i5kn015855 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:44:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com (h135-64-105-51.avaya.com [135.64.105.51]) by tierw.net.avaya.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i048i3kn015849 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:44:04 -0500 (EST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:47:11 +0200
Message-ID: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F042599CA@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Thread-Topic: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
Thread-Index: AcPQWMZLhT5QANBcTDOvAzhqo89LmwCRkX6w
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "Bridge-Mib (E-mail)" <bridge-mib@ietf.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes, the TC is useful. Concerning names, I do not know what VlanIdReference is supposed to mean, but at least it is not confusing like VlanIdAssociation. VlanIdOrNoneOrAny would be better. 

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: 01 January, 2004 1:17 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: 
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> 
> 
> OK, but do you think that the TC specified (none, a specific 
> one, or any)
> is a usefull one to have? ANd if yes, would then VlanIdReference be
> a proper name? Or do you have better names suggestions in that case.
> Would VlanIdOrNoneOrAny be better?
> 
> Thanks,
> Bert 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> > Sent: donderdag 1 januari 2004 9:54
> > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment:
> > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> > 
> > 
> > VlanIdAssociation is definitely a bad name - there are other 
> > 'VLAN associations' it may be confused with. 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org 
> > > [mailto:bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > > Sent: 31 December, 2003 6:52 PM
> > > To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> > > Subject: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: 
> > > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any comments?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bert 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark Ellison [mailto:ellison@ieee.org]
> > > Sent: woensdag 31 december 2003 20:04
> > > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > > Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: Please review and comment:
> > > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Bert,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your reply. 
> > > 
> > > I think I'd call a TC with a value range of Integer32 { 0 | 
> > 1..4094 | 
> > > 4095 }  a VlanIdReference or VlanIdAssociation.
> > > 
> > > This TC would be useful when defining an object that refers 
> > > to a vlan.  
> > > For example, a table where each entry can be associated with 
> > > none, one, 
> > > or any vlan.  One alternative, with the existing TCs, would 
> > be to use 
> > > VlanIdOrAny, but have the agent return noSuchInstance when 
> > > there is no 
> > > association with a vlan. Another alternative, with the 
> > existing TCs, 
> > > would be to use VlanIdOrNone, and not have use of the special 
> > > any/4095 
> > > value.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Mark
> > > 
> > > Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Sorry for late reaction... but I am now again looking at 
> > > >this document and the discussion that we had back in October.
> > > >
> > > >inline
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > >>-----Original Message-----
> > > >>From: Mark Ellison [mailto:ellison@ieee.org]
> > > >>Sent: donderdag 2 oktober 2003 20:12
> > > >>To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > > >>Cc: Mark Ellison; mibs@ops.ietf.org
> > > >>Subject: Re: Please review and comment:
> > > >>draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Hi Bert,
> > > >>
> > > >>I'm wondering if there could be any mib or pib definition 
> > > requiring a 
> > > >>range of ( 0 | 1..4094 | 4095 )  for possible values?
> > > >>
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >Mark, I have not seen anyone react to this as a option that they
> > > >wanted, so for now I am not going to include it.
> > > >It can of course always be added later if a need arises.
> > > >
> > > >By the way, what woyuld you call/name that TC?
> > > >
> > > >Bert
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > >>Regards,
> > > >>
> > > >>Mark
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>    
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bridge-mib mailing list
> > > Bridge-mib@ietf.org
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
> > > 
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib