Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-14.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 13 May 2021 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51417F407F3; Thu, 13 May 2021 05:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzjFBP_I_oMV; Thu, 13 May 2021 05:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02880F407EC; Thu, 13 May 2021 05:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C0B39119; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:44:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id j--oXF8vdgjl; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:44:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3675239117; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:44:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4EF22B; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:34:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
cc: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "6tisch-ads@ietf.org" <6tisch-ads@ietf.org>, "6tisch-chairs@ietf.org" <6tisch-chairs@ietf.org>, "ek.ietf@gmail.com" <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, "c310@rfc-editor.org" <c310@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <C5A340A0-2FDC-4064-8A9F-A0C047FC87AD@cisco.com>
References: <20210512190510.E4A78F407BC@rfc-editor.org> <15838.1620857752@localhost>, <CAH7SZV_1XGV4YtrMLqiD5fJqP2ze_gmR5ZmSBuEKVQYzyHkiFQ@mail.gmail.com> <C5A340A0-2FDC-4064-8A9F-A0C047FC87AD@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 08:34:55 -0400
Message-ID: <20019.1620909295@localhost>
Subject: Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-14.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c310@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c310.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c310/>
List-Post: <mailto:c310@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:34:59 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > You changed "an RPL" to "a RPL" in: is to serve as a RPL parent
    > [RFC6550] within a particular network

    > and this just sounds wrong to me.  I dunno...

    > In RFC 6550 it is used as "a RPL", because it is pronounced RPL as
    > "ripl" I guess.


    > Yes this is our practice… ´A RPL’ is correct because it reads ‘a
    > ripple’.

okay... so I say, "An AR PEE ELL" in my head, but yeah, what you say makes more sense.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide