IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00

Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com> Tue, 22 February 2005 18:59 UTC

X-Envelope-From: Jeff.Mogul@hp.com
X-Envelope-To: <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>
Received: from palrel11.hp.com (palrel11.hp.com [156.153.255.246]) by kahuna.osafoundation.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1MIxtaa032012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:59:55 -0800
Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by palrel11.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6CF1045F; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wera.hpl.hp.com (wera.hpl.hp.com [15.9.120.80]) by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id j1MIxroo023669; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wera.hpl.hp.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id j1MIxq51030488; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:59:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>
Message-Id: <200502221859.j1MIxq51030488@wera.hpl.hp.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: wera.hpl.hp.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:56:42 GMT." <20050222185642.GC22555@mail.shareable.org>
X-Organization: Hewlett-Packard Labs, Large Scale Systems group
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:59:52 -0800
X-Mts: smtp
X-Spam-Score: 0 ()
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 127.0.0.1
Cc: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, CalDAV DevList <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: [Ietf-caldav] Re: draft-reschke-http-addmember-00
X-BeenThere: ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Calendar Access protocol based on WebDAV <ietf-caldav.osafoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-caldav>, <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-caldav>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-caldav>, <mailto:ietf-caldav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:59:55 -0000

    > If Jamie is arguing that we need to add new method because
    > implementations are not compliant with the specs for the old
    > methods, that seems to be a recipe for doom.
    
    I'm arguing _against_ adding a new method.
    
Sorry! ... I guess I lost track of the thread at some point!
I still don't accept the "don't use OPTIONS" line of argument.
(If I got that part right.)

-Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email