Re: [Cats] Regarding IPR on draft-ldbc-cats-framework

[Xuewei Wang <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adrian, all,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPRs.
> From: "Xuewei Wang"<[e-mail]>
> Date:  Fri, Feb 23, 2024, 11:12
> Subject:  Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ldbc-cats-framework
> To: <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "'Chengli (Cheng Li)'"<[e-mail]>, "'Zongpeng Du'"<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, "'Shihang(Vincent)'"<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, "'cats'"<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
> Hi Adrian, all,
> Sorry for the late reply. There is IPR, because our company has less experience in IPR declarations, and the declarations would be completed as soon as possible after our detailed analysis and comparison.
> From: "Adrian Farrel"<[e-mail]>
> Date:  Mon, Feb 19, 2024, 22:48
> Subject:  Regarding IPR on draft-ldbc-cats-framework
> To: "'Chengli (Cheng Li)'"<[e-mail]>, "'Zongpeng Du'"<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, "'Shihang(Vincent)'"<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "'cats'"<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
> Authors and Contributors of draft-ldbc-cats-framework, CATS WG,
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email copying the CATS mailing list regardless
> of whether or not you are aware of any IPR that needs to be disclosed. This
> document will not
> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and contributor.
> 
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> 
> In preparation for WG Adoption of draft-ldbc-cats-framework, please state
> whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If your answer is "yes", has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF
> IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? Please answer
> either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If your answer here is "no", please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate including what action you have taken to ensure that the IPR is
> disclosed in a timely fashion.
> 
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as
> an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF
> IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more
> information, please see https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian (as co-chair)