IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7144)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 04 October 2022 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7026AC1526E5 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F3Zk8GuOBEoZ for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C036C1524A8 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 78F076AAD5; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: thomas.fossati@arm.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, cabo@tzi.org, cbor@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221004144918.78F076AAD5@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 07:49:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/38J-qO625XbNZoDDD7nBSdUP3Ho>
Subject: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7144)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:49:22 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9277,
"On Stable Storage for Items in Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7144

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>

Section: Appendix D

Original Text
-------------
{#sequences}

Corrected Text
--------------
(Section 2.3)

Notes
-----
It looks like a typo in the markdown (a missing pair of curly brackets) managed to trickle through the publication process.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC9277 (draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : On Stable Storage for Items in Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
Publication Date    : August 2022
Author(s)           : M. Richardson, C. Bormann
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email