Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7144)

Indeed, this looks almost right, but I think the correction is meant
to be "[RFC 8742]".  Carsten, Michael?

Barry

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:49 AM RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9277,
> "On Stable Storage for Items in Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7144
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>
>
> Section: Appendix D
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> {#sequences}
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> (Section 2.3)
>
> Notes
> -----
> It looks like a typo in the markdown (a missing pair of curly brackets) managed to trickle through the publication process.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9277 (draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : On Stable Storage for Items in Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
> Publication Date    : August 2022
> Author(s)           : M. Richardson, C. Bormann
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor