Re: [Cbor] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 10 September 2020 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C763A0972; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=a8lm3ENH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=higGQV91
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnfKnC6yTLAI; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66F13A0971; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9495C010F; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:35:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 20:35:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=T Sj5LRRajp9IHNScded71qE3vwQ71+w0y0HJHSykY18=; b=a8lm3ENHMQRnuu14V AHmYa9rvQXoWH8svoLfoGVZsdwVPPNk+QOzhA84W6imlFaptMjVYl8h6CW5oIQst uyroflslsFQrbcRZtx00t8szinXFrq89EgYVyXE89bwzbIU8dnWMU1pBIGxic0v3 A/SBH6YHdvNXVT0Mu4LDctUP4fJVrIUKIPDHLAzsvFN1wNOzRd1dmqel/kp0IP2m BrXDvPkQp4UOyNdql+y291JnzPlq3p+zqcH3STY72t2mWpi7pd9urtSi9P9yomHc KDQzA7wyKj+19A+i+ilX8V4BQBuk5UZc0VGIRwcbKDgFBXZ/MYgPYle03RH1L1XQ Z5x6A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=TSj5LRRajp9IHNScded71qE3vwQ71+w0y0HJHSykY 18=; b=higGQV91065hW0z5ATMvaUJzka4m1E3lM1CZiNoipb9WnpkZjsPc1KJhp i49zmb8s6UDRwpT6fqnIBG4srMkp/lkqo055jsTtndEhOvtWVqOgrwyI7eUOrLqL ih49p6C8F6lCw2xfXzPYuZ4R19rOyVq5fFdLuRqPQIQTXHLqTYhtNuJROWL3x8ib M+30O4BrWMkrSnRedJEo3zPLVdQz2oCJQj/nOYE4J/Qxlr+dt5fv39idJ0qlJoDa pct7pwzNkagIZLEjusmsVN25ThR+wMOD1rOPZiIErrC+rWSsfMtFxpMzBLq4xYmZ QAngDk0MEmTAwKJzzAJCIAcMGK9EQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:vHRZX9AnDPOfDs6FKu4Hiek0hzsTdmNc1njv526PETOaha7kWNN8Mg> <xme:vHRZX7jvp8OLuUhRjjIs6RNgwvzf9xLAcwVn-vse2016WOhRyDADvMegqW12kT6Ou 3SQIS4F6kWpgFAUXg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehiedgfeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeefudfhgfetgfetvddvffeiuddtkeffgedvjeejtdeiheefgfelfeeutdel vdfggfenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedrudduje drjeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep rghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:vHRZX4m54LQ67dl6Q8B2iDlnR5zM9ISQj3aQddiGK7prPdP8evLshw> <xmx:vHRZX3yBjwdKmxdFCK9SkJfNuoZHgl4TKcF127oTuBndKgCZ3R-bkA> <xmx:vHRZXyROA0lAK-g4B9UQXc3JTA0UjK8maRblzVbGRTb3bDC5hjtymg> <xmx:vHRZX4NCvZsT13TbnXRgB1A3Nrm4OBH0wZydWKFeKjqk8xEmAEWOrw>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.73]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 07913328005D; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR00MB067624B9BA8B2AD2D514A60DF54B0@BY5PR00MB0676.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:35:07 -0400
Cc: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag.all@ietf.org>, "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CFCD4366-BDF8-4530-8E74-761197219DB6@cooperw.in>
References: <BY5PR00MB067624B9BA8B2AD2D514A60DF54B0@BY5PR00MB0676.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/3Kw1usiiU7L7lw0ZfVizHHmDNs8>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:35:13 -0000

Linda, thanks for your review. All, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Aug 5, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I agree with Jim's response to the comparison question.
> 
> An RFC is being created because a tag is being registered in the Specification Required range of the Tags Registry specified at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7049#section-7.2.
> 
> 				-- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> 
> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 5:58 PM
> To: 'Linda Dunbar' <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>om>; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org; cbor@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 5:38 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org; cbor@ietf.org
> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review Date: 2020-08-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-08-14
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
>    This is a very simple draft, describing how calendar dates are represented,
>    the same way as common knowledge  on how calendar dates are represented.  I
>    am surprised that the draft is "STANDARD track".  Why?  The only thing
>    might be that Tag 1004 is Text String, and Tag 100 is a negative integer. 
>    Is it all for a RFC?
> 
> Section 1.3 states that Dates cannot be properly compared unless Time Zone is attached. Strangely, the Time Zone is not included in the tag 1004 or Tag 100. 
> Why?
> 
> [JLS] Linda, This section deals not with comparing Dates with each other, but comparing Dates with Date/Time Values.  This would mean that comparing 01/01/2020 with 01/01/2020 3:59 PST does not make any sense because one has a Time Zone and the other does not.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Best regards,
> Linda Dunbar
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art