Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group Adoption for draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl
"Kepeng Li" <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 09:29 UTC
Return-Path: <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ECD131DDE for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fMut1IihNoan for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out0-236.mail.aliyun.com (out0-236.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F5D126E3A for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1500370154; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Mime-version:Content-type; bh=LFkc6ax+fsPVQ9TngoBejZBRs3Y4/22eMziFBPbVeiU=; b=Hv1yfkeNfcUDnQgVL0k1itQlplrVkRaOoh4+LHDTxJo5XJ4VOb1C42NWS5ld72lYLaiOqAT+xc/TFxDrdZEyIb8ihF0zQUazzZDKigH5nTXgWNXZPz6I/d0Z5VA0Cym7lmYI2ONN1Gtq7NxCf8GTnYhaNfsIl/kz8UCuKjykxv0=
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R211e4; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e02c03297; MF=kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=2; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---.8REDVyk_1500370147;
Received: from 30.27.110.15(mailfrom:kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com ip:106.11.34.20) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:29:11 +0800
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.8.160830
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:29:06 +0800
From: Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
To: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net>, cbor@ietf.org
Message-ID: <D593F5AD.5D5ED%kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
Thread-Topic: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group Adoption for draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl
References: <HE1PR0701MB25390DA8E0A1BEDE50EF206D98D40@HE1PR0701MB2539.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <4de102ae-44b6-3361-9866-bf6674da90ff@outer-planes.net>
In-Reply-To: <4de102ae-44b6-3361-9866-bf6674da90ff@outer-planes.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/AlUkrU3bq3rbworvyAsNMU4P10w>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group Adoption for draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:29:24 -0000
I support for adopting this draft as a working group item. Kind Regards Kepeng ε¨ 18/07/2017, 5:22 PMοΌ "CBOR on behalf of Matthew A. Miller" <cbor-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of linuxwolf@outer-planes.net> εε ₯: >On 7/5/17 11:48 AM, Francesca Palombini wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> At the IETF98 meeting, we had in-room consensus to adopt >> draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl as a starting point to work on CBOR >> data definition language. The authors have now updated the document and >> feel this is ready to be a wg item. >> >> >> >> This is a confirmation call for adopting this draft as a working group >> item. If you do not agree with the in-room consensus that we had in >> Chicago to adopt this as a WG document, please speak up until >> 2017-07-19. If you werenβt in the room but do agree with adopting this >> document, you can also tell us. >> >> >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl-11 > >I re-iterate my support for adopting this draft as a working group item. > >I also support moving this document to the Standards Track. > > >- m&m > >Matthew A. Miller >< http://goo.gl/LM55L > > > >_______________________________________________ >CBOR mailing list >CBOR@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
- [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group Adopβ¦ Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Jeffrey Yasskin
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Matthew A. Miller
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Kepeng Li
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Sean Leonard
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Matthew A. Miller
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Sean Leonard
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Sean Leonard
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Brian E Carpenter
- [Cbor] Does CDDL need to be standards track to be⦠Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] Does CDDL need to be standards track t⦠Sean Leonard
- Re: [Cbor] Does CDDL need to be standards track t⦠Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Does CDDL need to be standards track t⦠Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] Does CDDL need to be standards track t⦠Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Cbor] π Confirmation call for Working Group β¦ Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Cbor] Does CDDL need to be standards track t⦠Jim Schaad