IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] 🔔 Confirmation call for Working Group Adoption for draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3806F131A50 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47S_Jw3VYwwr for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1BD12F3CB for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.122.105] (unknown [174.65.80.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 035B522E256 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C31AD8F5-51A5-4EE5-9A29-31A7469C3808"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:50:04 -0700
References: <HE1PR0701MB25390DA8E0A1BEDE50EF206D98D40@HE1PR0701MB2539.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB25390DA8E0A1BEDE50EF206D98D40@HE1PR0701MB2539.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Message-Id: <2FBE4C5B-2661-437A-883F-4F6E7FFBF204@seantek.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/QbkWCV2-42V4uwjPFXmn3MFpM88>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] 🔔 Confirmation call for Working Group Adoption for draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:50:15 -0000

As expressed at the IETF 99 meeting, I support WG adoption of this draft.

At this time, I also support it being on the Informational track (its current track). The track can be changed later if needed.

Sean

> On Jul 5, 2017, at 2:48 AM, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
>  
> At the IETF98 meeting, we had in-room consensus to adopt draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl as a starting point to work on CBOR data definition language. The authors have now updated the document and feel this is ready to be a wg item.
>  
> This is a confirmation call for adopting this draft as a working group item. If you do not agree with the in-room consensus that we had in Chicago to adopt this as a WG document, please speak up until 2017-07-19. If you weren’t in the room but do agree with adopting this document, you can also tell us.
>  
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl-11 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl-11>
>  
> Thanks,
> Francesca
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email