Re: [Cbor] 🔔 Confirmation call for Working Group Adoption for draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl

"Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net> Thu, 20 July 2017 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FA2131C12 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outer-planes-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KoOVb2ohozte for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA42131C14 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id w126so21686158wme.0 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outer-planes-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=xelRXTIZWFjcjcA+Nf/cTk4BGgpmet56hJc5hyDwZvo=; b=O85Xx7XDAH1sq5DU/vmsgESlD5RNMqML27PwoyExQHyh08ar5a7dpUp2w9iHGNbqYu ewpnryESLwjZclEOF5hzeEACimKs0sgmfS1cr60OmC6iB9NqokqHQDjARoRZGvfqq+du vgKcFr+TkhyVI41Mm4lq6CBxoPyyx6XK5WsBLi7t4iJe39Jm54GOZMVJulXNfmJyEnLS e35VT6NyQkm54gaUb5F6DqfliL70i1qoe/2tdpdb7OUOmOYpY6PKpfBaazmJApX9k88e nUt84Xym1agiMUzMZFiMqyrADuQr6pREehDGF7s7Ip3Ht/MiCVrFQYS7kb0Thuf9sEkO 3xpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xelRXTIZWFjcjcA+Nf/cTk4BGgpmet56hJc5hyDwZvo=; b=pg0mnpySRr0I0koerLDhQBg/Zg4aLXSpiqTU2AOTjDbKiCnrJD5/QTcYl1LMr5t30q CTH7lOjNQgL4PUweFNKOU8DYWqSk62pCV8VaSn0i1h/Kv0359tV9HxIxoLlV27ODR9f5 mNwahR+Rk+oFMSoBsfdSCTRIIQkjvY6NnBLKan6uP0//peG4iU9i7xqBhnV4fMk8Kw1K CclhATb0tsfPxFpbbe2kTSCf62C/KGqxqfkYS5W96Lm1HuC9Lsx2bDpMJoLdF5SMEVCZ 57vgEm6U0yvHKfaDwdXk1Cf/LlbN+xvt94GV8MwNaK2Xy7Sag7epj0LDQK3Jt2Fn/Iw6 3+tA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1126LjVBw9MKqJt+/AZ0s3rp920FjshwVrGdEdhtyrcPOWo6wMcp Dt2DlR6QaH8FgmRqMSEP1w==
X-Received: by 10.28.234.18 with SMTP id i18mr101343wmh.89.1500549949359; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:1006:f2c2:920c:b511? ([2001:67c:370:128:1006:f2c2:920c:b511]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k45sm6297899wrk.45.2017.07.20.04.25.48 for <cbor@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: cbor@ietf.org
References: <HE1PR0701MB25390DA8E0A1BEDE50EF206D98D40@HE1PR0701MB2539.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <2FBE4C5B-2661-437A-883F-4F6E7FFBF204@seantek.com> <432f706c-dfab-0dd9-60c5-f761a1a95f67@gmail.com>
From: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net>
Message-ID: <d56729f1-ce76-99ba-5184-41edc339d5a4@outer-planes.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:25:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/55.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <432f706c-dfab-0dd9-60c5-f761a1a95f67@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6xhi6ssfvDn5Vf399osoj7UJL8ufx7jJE"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/ZLKPOKDSlarWhJBnn1-O519PmaI>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] 🔔 Confirmation call for Working Group Adoption for draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:26:00 -0000

On 17/07/20 03:26, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 20/07/2017 03:50, Sean Leonard wrote:
>> As expressed at the IETF 99 meeting, I support WG adoption of this draft.
> 
> Yes
> 
>> At this time, I also support it being on the Informational track (its current track). The track can be changed later if needed.
> 
> It's needed now. The IESG just approved at least one draft that has it as
> a normative reference. How else do you plan to precisely specify CBOR
> message formats?
> 

I agree, and the practical work to convert from informational to
standards track is a single line change in the source.  I suggest the
chairs tell the authors/editors make that change to the
"draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-00" they submit.


- m&m

Matthew A. Miller
< http://goo.gl/LM55L >