IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] Re: EDN file extension (Re: registrations before WGLC Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-23.txt)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 02 May 2026 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82445E7E04E9 for <cbor@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 2 May 2026 07:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1777733069; bh=iUGFk+gKatCZUvuiqHbNgIixNxXgm0HK7eRNhNpPqzY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=G1QO/sbgzkjgAYH1187rteKoBQTcsys/ggVRZpcBiz3Q66H2JbrGclELImCypTdCt n+xFrJJCkGfjfhGtOVjMxNzlP2N8pFC/NbuCaW5LuozAfedUKMa9Dja2lpdFy7sInZ AWS9StjN8POqG7Jd/HyeRnw2GxKeLpo7LI6hyzkg=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tzi.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfuxlI98AYNC for <cbor@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 2 May 2026 07:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E615E7E04E4 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 May 2026 07:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tzi.org; s=2019; t=1777733066; bh=iUGFk+gKatCZUvuiqHbNgIixNxXgm0HK7eRNhNpPqzY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=GDPhv2kBxLsLqeVV+d/4rw1D/NiRyL0VaH02plbGn69Sa4qLLqpc3tw9xWPMBGA5R ohCz9xTWzUS72UsZOFoSn0JcF8d363WmgGT7v3uI9SM1pDy9MnUkFwQncwD9qLSbQJ ir9E4G7887wruHmTIOu/lYjaewkwGkSzzUJ6umrHmBbqTsJs0sFjt9uGLeqKao9+1k 4pfXAyFnXNWCBS+9wJlTIXrkFMDOVuvJ4Qmoypx0iYJXbHKmnvyaPNqb12A/THk9YQ +lsfB8Vpz8ReRnMBfyN8+Cy8QIrRN63Wa65YR8BP0CwZfx9ZfP14Y6wiezcum6u7bW AJn1kIylRdhpw==
Received: from clients-pool1-0117.vpn.uni-bremen.de (clients-pool1-0117.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4g79fL1W4GzDCbH; Sat, 2 May 2026 16:44:26 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20260502165720.62ca0142@nuclight.lan>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2026 16:44:25 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 799425864.9926651-6b6dcc82f34450b0606ba514ec5ed1b0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EF44820E-2009-43A0-9F30-F60615114062@tzi.org>
References: <177746864313.330731.1323092014299188811@dt-datatracker-b45949c58-t72jx> <20260429192059.7e7ade5b@nuclight.lan> <DDA81B0B-0E8E-4312-9AEE-897B91477395@tzi.org> <CAKoiRuaQfpoDonk5emxR6EEywOJCngJWA=v2Wk10w34i_7piZA@mail.gmail.com> <7E78E99D-4549-4556-96AB-68ED6E362831@tzi.org> <20260502165720.62ca0142@nuclight.lan>
To: Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
X-FromAuthMilter: ok
Message-ID-Hash: CALLIJSFXHWD6C7ELW4SLSREFZW3UMP6
X-Message-ID-Hash: CALLIJSFXHWD6C7ELW4SLSREFZW3UMP6
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Cbor] Re: EDN file extension (Re: registrations before WGLC Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-23.txt)
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" <cbor.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/O2-KN45LhMhRQyjzRBrbXMH3Oyo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cbor-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbor-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbor-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Vadim,

On 2026-05-02, at 15:57, Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> application/edn8610

We generally don’t want to hardwire RFC numbers in something like a media-type name — RFCs are updated/replaced at some point, and then you are saddled with continuing to use an old number and/or have a new number that you cannot actually use because many implementations still expect the old one.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status