IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] hildjj/cbor-map-entries: Explicit Map datatype for CBOR, in array format

worley@ariadne.com Thu, 18 February 2021 03:47 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9A23A1F7C for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:47:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zCfh5R1IORFQ for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 641B33A1F7A for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.108]) by resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id Ca3xl0PJ7fFsMCaHwlu3bP; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:47:36 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1613620056; bh=SIryGVQZILq7ua1Lt7x0AePZ2fPMaiOtVYd4YimjmVc=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=e1VjbHLX8rD+wpwGJriOZaNIe61MiRDT1f3ttnjW95C1aM5+uftk88XqX8TLFnd5X 2GMp05vUkYg0BBN8ku2eUMqtZUOURYTfTw+YKbLerTvgtLOXy/RE12cVbGpwCMTdPo sJarOPx4IRsTVMqX0B9slLYEOyVupiDljyPOIhFWLDAaPmrqye0pPZ8z1AGiEuNDo+ hA14zNuwrz9Y5mAlhAm9sHVxJVTXJK4KvCpT9pcWwtFCI1elvRQeoKtSp3jzVlIklf Rbx17GeXzYHXL+6fTb3gjERVNUo7nGdpF7ictey+c2FoIm2DyNjedmQlcASj/f/IZn BpVH7W5jsLzaA==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id CaHslAXTRo85jCaHtl4q8H; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:47:35 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-97.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11I3lVcN005127; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 22:47:31 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 11I3lR0j005122; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 22:47:27 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CA182161-D902-4B9B-9AD7-B3FA20AD47FC@tzi.org> (cabo@tzi.org)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 22:47:26 -0500
Message-ID: <87zh02kpf5.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/Wt0nkjblfKvmD7cuYPFPN5Jt4AI>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] hildjj/cbor-map-entries: Explicit Map datatype for CBOR, in array format
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:47:40 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> writes:
> Do we agree that an order-preserving map occurs often enough to
> warrant a 1+1 (or even 1+0?) tag?

I may have missed the discussion, but do we have a clear defition of
"order-preserving"?  Naively, that seems to include every issue about
how you compare values ever asked.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email