Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Tue, 18 December 2012 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F44B21F8700 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:18:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vDd5RtKV2v5H for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:18:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABB421F850D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:18:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2788; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1355851112; x=1357060712; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=P0jYtw9biQr4Ls4XuTXOq4l5ltEPdBPGpi5S0mblVeY=; b=Y1yewnsiS+iXYYOFZ3UEknvoqbWs0A6pkDgT7x1edERlZujyX00h3dzU 9plmLy0fkqj10UtAyVEyRovFmPQ5hm+2bb71DO9e/JGhfO9gvVQ9Lu2H5 49YCjUno/I5bxFys785v/ooFNpqUd4DqCAjLJJkd4n9U1aWLaIC+vb5Lt Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAL2k0FCtJXG//2dsb2JhbABFvikWc4IeAQEBAwE6OgUFBwQCAQgRBAEBAQoUCQcyFAkIAgQBDQUIiAUGDKgWkD+MSQuDV2EDlyaPLIJzgW01
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,309,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="151266050"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2012 17:18:32 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBIHIW2R018956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:18:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.18]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:18:31 -0600
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03
Thread-Index: AQHN3H9eYPZrgLJ8WEav7W/eAK/k75gezaow
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:18:31 +0000
Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC101F934D@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
References: <50BE8093.7090800@labn.net> <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B001CF@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <50CF5BF4.9080008@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <50CF5BF4.9080008@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.57]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, Rudiger Kunze <ruediger.kunze@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:18:47 -0000

I'm also aware of the same IPR, which is still being documented.

Cheers

Matt

 
> Lou,
> 
> Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
> No, the IPR is still being documented.
> 
> Cheers,
> Clarence
> 
> On 15/12/2012 16:09, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
> > Hi Lou, et al-
> >
> > Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
> > No, the IPR has not been disclosed but it's a work in progress.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards...Zafar
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 6:01 PM
> >> To: Zafar Ali (zali); George Swallow (swallow); Clarence Filsfils
> >> (cfilsfil); Matt Hartley (mhartley); Kenji Kumaki; Rudiger Kunze;
> >> CCAMP
> >> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03
> >>
> >> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
> >>
> >> As part of the preparation for the poll on making this document a WG
> >> document:
> >>
> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-
> recording-03?
> >>
> >>    Please state either:
> >>
> >>    "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>    or
> >>    "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>
> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879,
> >> 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> >>
> >>     If yes to the above, please state either:
> >>
> >>    "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> >>    or
> >>    "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >>
> >>    If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> >>    appropriate.
> >>
> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
> >> the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not
> >> you are aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to
> >> the next stage until a response has been received from each author
> >> and listed contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> >>
> >> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author
> >> or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR
> >> rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR
> >> of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating
> >> in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For
> more information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> CCAMP WG Chairs
> >>
> >> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> >
> >
> >