RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq
Ron Bonica <Ronald.P.Bonica@mci.com> Sat, 07 June 2003 23:10 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 23:12:16 +0000
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 19:10:02 -0400
From: Ron Bonica <Ronald.P.Bonica@mci.com>
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq
To: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, Xiaoming Fu <fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <DKEJJCOCJMHEFFNMLKMPIECPJJAA.Ronald.P.Bonica@mci.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Folks, I have submitted a new version of the draft to address Xiaoming's comment. Until the draft editor posts the new version, you can find it at www.bonica.org/docs/draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq-05.txt. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On > Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:00 PM > To: Xiaoming Fu > Cc: Ron Bonica; ccamp@ops.ietf.org > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq > > > Hi Xiaoming, > > > For example, TCP might be useful for passing some firewalls and possibly > > I don't believe that firewalls would come into the picture in most > uses of tunnel trace -- it's not a replacement for traceroute, but > more of a SP tool. > > That said, it might be worth mentioning (but not requiring) that > TCP be a possible transport. > > Kireeti. >
- RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Ron Bonica
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Xiaoming Fu
- draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Ron Bonica
- RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Ron Bonica
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Kireeti Kompella
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Kireeti Kompella
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Xiaoming Fu
- RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Ron Bonica
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Xiaoming Fu