RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq

Ron Bonica <Ronald.P.Bonica@mci.com> Sat, 07 June 2003 23:10 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 23:12:16 +0000
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 19:10:02 -0400
From: Ron Bonica <Ronald.P.Bonica@mci.com>
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq
To: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, Xiaoming Fu <fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <DKEJJCOCJMHEFFNMLKMPIECPJJAA.Ronald.P.Bonica@mci.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Folks,

I have submitted a new version of the draft to address Xiaoming's comment.
Until the draft editor posts the new version, you can find it at
www.bonica.org/docs/draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq-05.txt.

                                   Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:00 PM
> To: Xiaoming Fu
> Cc: Ron Bonica; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq
>
>
> Hi Xiaoming,
>
> > For example, TCP might be useful for passing some firewalls and possibly
>
> I don't believe that firewalls would come into the picture in most
> uses of tunnel trace -- it's not a replacement for traceroute, but
> more of a SP tool.
>
> That said, it might be worth mentioning (but not requiring) that
> TCP be a possible transport.
>
> Kireeti.
>