Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq
Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net> Fri, 06 June 2003 22:00 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 22:02:50 +0000
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 15:00:15 -0700
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
To: Xiaoming Fu <fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
cc: Ron Bonica <Ronald.P.Bonica@mci.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq
Message-ID: <20030606145649.F14888@kummer.juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi Xiaoming, > For example, TCP might be useful for passing some firewalls and possibly I don't believe that firewalls would come into the picture in most uses of tunnel trace -- it's not a replacement for traceroute, but more of a SP tool. That said, it might be worth mentioning (but not requiring) that TCP be a possible transport. Kireeti.
- RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Ron Bonica
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Xiaoming Fu
- draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Ron Bonica
- RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Ron Bonica
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Kireeti Kompella
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Kireeti Kompella
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Xiaoming Fu
- RE: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Ron Bonica
- Re: draft-ietf-ccamp-tracereq Xiaoming Fu