RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status
John Drake <jdrake@calient.net> Wed, 11 August 2004 18:32 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA24786 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:32:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BuxyY-0004jO-Io for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:37:26 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BuxkB-0008Oh-Tp for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:22:35 +0000
Received: from [63.102.55.206] (helo=lightwave.chromisys.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1Buxjl-0008L8-3x for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:22:09 +0000
Received: by lightwave.chromisys.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <PWZJ7530>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:22:05 -0700
Message-ID: <9D42C6E086250248810DCADA39CE7EFC01B75675@nimbus.chromisys.com>
From: John Drake <jdrake@calient.net>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Cc: 'Kireeti Kompella' <kireeti@juniper.net>, Tove Madsen <Tove.Madsen@acreo.se>
Subject: RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:22:05 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 00e94c813bef7832af255170dca19e36
Yes to all > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:52 AM > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org > Cc: 'Kireeti Kompella'; Tove Madsen > Subject: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status > > Hi, > > In San Diego we had four drafts for immediate consideration as working > group drafts. > (There were a few other drafts that needed a little attention first, but > will come up for > consideration in the near future.) > > Please send your comments to the list or to the chairs. A brief "yes" or > "no" will > suffice, but a reason with any "no" would be helpful. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > > 1. Loose Path Re-optimization > draft-vasseur-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-02.txt > This draft is stable and has an implementation. > The work is predominantly pertinent to inter-domain signaling, but could > also be used > within a domain. > The meeting in San Diego reported relatively few as having read the draft, > but no > objection to it becoming a WG draft. > > 2. A Transport Network View of LMP > draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-transport-lmp-02.txt > There has been a bit of off-list discussion about this draft in which it > has become clear > that there are definite differences between the ASON and CCAMP uses and > views of LMP. This > is precisely what the draft is intended to expose. That is, the draft is > not intended to > unify the views of LMP, but rather to represent the two views within a > single document so > as to highlight the differences. > In San Diego, no-one raised objections to this being a WG draft. > > 3. Graceful restart > draft-aruns-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-01.txt > This draft represents a merger of two previous drafts and was created at > the specific > request of the WG in Seoul. > There is some more editorial work to be done on the draft, but the main > technical content > appears to be stable. > In San Diego there was some support and no opposition to this becoming a > WG draft. > > 4. Inter-domain Framework > draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-01.txt > ** I am principal editor. Please take any issues with this to Kireeti ** > This draft provides a framework for the multi-domain solutions work that > the WG is > chartered to address. > In San Diego there were some questions about whether the draft should be > extended to cover > other, more complex, inter-domain functions. There was no conclusion about > whether this > should be done before or after becoming a WG draft (if it should be done > at all). > > >
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… zafar ali
- Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status Adrian Farrel
- RE : Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG s… LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Igor Bryskin
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… dimitri papadimitriou
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… zafar ali
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Don Fedyk
- LMP transport [Was: Re: Soliciting comments on mo… Adrian Farrel
- RE: LMP transport [Was: Re: Soliciting comments o… zafar ali
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Jean Philippe Vasseur
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… dimitri papadimitriou
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Richard Rabbat
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… John Drake
- Re-opt [Was: Re: Soliciting comments on moving dr… Adrian Farrel
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Dimitri.Papadimitriou
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Richard Rabbat
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Greg Bernstein
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Don Fedyk
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Jean Philippe Vasseur
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Don Fedyk
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… dimitri papadimitriou
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Richard Rabbat
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Richard Rabbat