RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status

["Don Fedyk" <[e-mail]>]

Zafar

I concur with Dimitri's comments, this document informational only

Regards,
Don 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dimitri papadimitriou [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 1:05 PM
> To: zafar ali
> Cc: 'Adrian Farrel'; [e-mail]; 'Kireeti Kompella'; 
> 'Tove Madsen'
> Subject: Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status
> 
> 
> zafar,
> 
> the point has been already asked during the meeting, to 
> summarize, the 
> basic idea:
> 
> - is to have a "decoder ring" for understanding ITU work and IETF work
>    (-> for publication as informational RFC only)
> 
> - is NOT to define anything in this document as the intention is first
>    to understand the two groups work efforts and then do a series of
>    liaisons to determine/assess if any additional work is needed
> 
> hope this clarifies,
> 
> thanks,
> - dimitri.
> 
> ---
> zafar ali wrote:
> 
> > "yes" to (1), (3) and (4),
> > 
> > Conditional "yes" to draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-transport-lmp-02.txt, 
> > depending on the answer to the following:
> > 
> > Does Author plan to address link management solution space between 
> > ASON and GMPLS in the same document? I would prefer that 
> and in which 
> > case I think adaptation of this document as a WG document 
> to be deferred to a later
> > point.   
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Regards... Zafar
> > 
<snip>