RE: LMP transport [Was: Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status]
"zafar ali" <zali@cisco.com> Tue, 10 August 2004 18:00 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA17543 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:00:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BuazU-0001ig-FZ for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:04:53 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BuaiK-000BDI-OC for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:47:08 +0000
Received: from [64.102.122.149] (helo=rtp-iport-2.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BuahV-000B6P-Rb for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:46:17 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2004 13:46:17 -0400
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from zaliw2k01 (rtp-vpn2-374.cisco.com [10.82.241.118]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i7AHkEAU026167; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:46:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: zafar ali <zali@cisco.com>
To: 'Adrian Farrel' <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: LMP transport [Was: Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:47:45 -0400
Organization: Cisco Systems
Message-ID: <002601c47f02$25399790$0200a8c0@amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.5709
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <020601c47eff$73f78ca0$2e849ed9@Puppy>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS autolearn=no version=2.64
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>-----Original Message----- >From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org >[mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel >Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 1:13 PM >To: zafar ali; ccamp@ops.ietf.org >Subject: LMP transport [Was: Re: Soliciting comments on moving >drafts to WG status] > > >> Conditional "yes" to draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-transport-lmp-02.txt, >> depending on the answer to the following: >> >> Does Author plan to address link management solution space between >> ASON and GMPLS in the same document? I would prefer that and >in which >> case I think adaptation of this document as a WG document to be >> deferred to a later point. > >Hi Zafar, > >I'm not quite clear what you mean by "address link management >solution space". Do you mean a comparison of the ways that LMP >is used and any extensions that may have been made to the >protocol? Or do you mean an analysis of what needs to be >"fixed" and the appropriate new extensions to the protocol? > Both, in that order. But as I mentioned I am ok on however Authors would like to position this ID. >If the latter, I think a question that led in this direction >was asked in SD. > >Kireeti's response was to the effect that we have to do the >analysis first, identifying the "secret decoder ring", and >showing the differences between the ITU and IETF views. Then >we would start a series of liaisons to SG15 to figure out what >needs to be fixed and by whom. Finally, work could begin on >protocol modifications. > >This document is targeted at the first step only. > >OTOH, if you meant the first option (i.e. a comparison of how >the protocol is used and what extensions have already been >made), that seems to me to be valuable in this document. > >What do the authors say? > >Cheers, >Adrian > >
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… zafar ali
- Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG status Adrian Farrel
- RE : Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG s… LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Igor Bryskin
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… dimitri papadimitriou
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… zafar ali
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Don Fedyk
- LMP transport [Was: Re: Soliciting comments on mo… Adrian Farrel
- RE: LMP transport [Was: Re: Soliciting comments o… zafar ali
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Jean Philippe Vasseur
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… dimitri papadimitriou
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Richard Rabbat
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… John Drake
- Re-opt [Was: Re: Soliciting comments on moving dr… Adrian Farrel
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Dimitri.Papadimitriou
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Richard Rabbat
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Greg Bernstein
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Don Fedyk
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Jean Philippe Vasseur
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Don Fedyk
- Re: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… dimitri papadimitriou
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Richard Rabbat
- RE: Soliciting comments on moving drafts to WG st… Richard Rabbat