Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04.txt
John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Thu, 23 August 2012 17:15 UTC
Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBFA21F85AF for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.830, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUMEbcEVLsxy for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og124.obsmtp.com (exprod7og124.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A2E21F85A8 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob124.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUDZlTREbJKUB1Q0b51WmdtD9PFgPkzRg@postini.com; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:15:58 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::88f9:77fd:dfc:4d51%11]) with mapi; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:15:36 -0700
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:15:34 -0700
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04.txt
Thread-Index: Ac2BSy6dKWryoN3/QKaPbjEu2q9iwwAB6kfg
Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A6321CE148@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <B7D2A316AA32B6469D9670B6A81B7C24071272@xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B7D2A316AA32B6469D9670B6A81B7C24071272@xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:15:59 -0000
This sounds extremely reasonable. Yours irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:21 AM > To: ccamp@ietf.org > Subject: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls- > tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04.txt > > Dear WG, > > We like to request a review from the WG on the changes in version 04 of > the draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp compared to > version 03. > > The majority of the proposed changes are around the format and how to > populate the extended association object as listed below. > > Note: Based on the feedbacks received so far, changes for items 4 and 5 > below will be reverted. > > 1. Association-ID: > It was not clear from reading the version 03 of the draft how this > field is populated in the extended association object. New version 04 > proposes to populate this field from the locally provisioned value. As > this value is identically provisioned on both ends, it provides a field > to tie the two (forward and reverse) LSPs on end-points. > > 2. IPv4 association source: > New version 04 adds a tie breaker rule for double sided provisioned > LSPs. > > 3. Global association source: > New version clarifies the usage for this field siting information from > RFC6370 and other mentioned drafts. No new rule added. > > 4. Association Type and Association Flags: > New version proposes to use one association Type for single and double > sided provisioned bi-directional LSPs and define association flags for > them. These changes will be reverted as they are not necessary. There > will not be Association Flags field in the next version. > > 5. Support for co-routed LSPs: > New version 04 defines a flag and handling for co-routed LSPs. Based on > the WG feedback received, these changes will be reverted. > > 6. Extended Association ID (Address): > New version 04 proposes to use an IP address as extended association ID > (address) as an additional identifier. Previous version 03 defines a > variable length field but did not mention what parameters can be added > there. > A tie breaker rule is defined for double sided provisioned value. > > 7. Path Protection object: > Version 03 of the draft vaguely mentioned and assumed of using > protection object for path protection. New version 04 adds some texts > to clarify it, no new rule is added. > > 8. Auto-tunnel mesh: > New version 04 adds a section to elaborate on a use case for auto- > tunnel mesh. This is added as an FYI and can be removed if WG thinks > so. > > 9. Clarification for Inter-AS LSPs: > I believe there was an email exchange between Lou and Fei to clarify > the relationship with draft I-D, draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext- > tunnel-num. A section is added in version-04 to address this. Please > review the added text. > > Please advise us on above changes. Based on the consensus, we will > update the draft accordingly. > > Thanks, > Rakesh > > > -----Original Message----- > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 10:53 AM > To: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) > Cc: zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn; jingrq@ctbri.com.cn > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte- > ext-associated-lsp-04.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated- > lsp-04.txt > has been successfully submitted by Rakesh Gandhi and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Filename: draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp > Revision: 04 > Title: RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs > Creation date: 2012-08-15 > WG ID: ccamp > Number of pages: 17 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp- > mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04.txt > Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls- > tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp- > rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 > Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp- > mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 > > Abstract: > The MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) requirements document > [RFC5654], > describes that MPLS-TP MUST support associated bidirectional point- > to-point LSPs. > > This document provides a method to bind two unidirectional Label > Switched Paths (LSPs) into an associated bidirectional LSP. The > association is achieved by defining the new Association Type in the > Extended ASSOCIATION object. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-ietf-… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… John E Drake
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Review Request For Changes in draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)