Re: [CCAMP] POLLING on draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-05

Hi Daniele,

My preference is option 1. Option 2 is not too far from option 1 so I can
support option 2 if necessary.

Thanks
Young

2020년 11월 21일 (토) 오전 12:08, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=
40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>님이 작성:

> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> This is a polling to follow up on the discussion we had during the IETF
> session.
>
> *The polling will be closed on Friday 27th November.*
>
>
>
> Please indicate which option (more than one allowed) do you support. You
> can motivate why an option and why not another or share if you are aware of
> existing implementations.
>
>
>
>    - Option 1: The draft is good as is today.
>    - Option 2: We need to add text specifying the use cases that we want
>    to cover. More precisely identify the cases that are outside the scope of
>    the solution proposed.
>    - Option 3: Contribute to ITU-T to have all the cases covered by
>    application codes.
>    - Option 4: Remove explicit parameters in the organizational-mode
>    because they are considered implicit parameters in the mode. This allows to
>    cover cases where the same mode is used for transceivers that extend (but
>    not limit) the operation range of a mode.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniele, Fatai.
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>