Re: [CCAMP] POLLING on draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-05

[Dieter Beller <[e-mail]>]

Hi Daniele,

my preference is clearly Option 1.
Option 2 is my second preferred option - adding text to the draft 
describing how the model can be applied to some use cases is always helpful.

As pointed out by Sergio, we do have an implementation very close to the 
organizational-mode approach.

Thanks,
Dieter

On 20.11.2020 16:08, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This is a polling to follow up on the discussion we had during the 
> IETF session.
>
> *The polling will be closed on Friday 27^th November.*
>
> Please indicate which option (more than one allowed) do you support. 
> You can motivate why an option and why not another or share if you are 
> aware of existing implementations.
>
>   * Option 1: The draft is good as is today.
>   * Option 2: We need to add text specifying the use cases that we
>     want to cover. More precisely identify the cases that are outside
>     the scope of the solution proposed.
>   * Option 3: Contribute to ITU-T to have all the cases covered by
>     application codes.
>   * Option 4: Remove explicit parameters in the organizational-mode
>     because they are considered implicit parameters in the mode. This
>     allows to cover cases where the same mode is used for transceivers
>     that extend (but not limit) the operation range of a mode.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniele, Fatai.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp