Re: [CCAMP] Proposed SG15 Liaison response on LS314

Hi Deborah, 
This looks fine to me. I'd like to note that while the phrase "mature to progress" may sound a bit awkward, this was the exact phasing in the ITU COM 15 – LS 314 – E liaison.

Liaison response to request for review of OSPFv2 extensions for ASON
routing submission (ref. TD 552 (WP 3/15))
https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file1235.pdf

Thanks,
Acee  

On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:30 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI) wrote:

> CCAMP,
> 
> Here's a proposed response to SG15. Let us know if any concerns/comments by August 31st.
> 
> Thanks,
> Deborah and Lou
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> To: Q14/15
> Subject: Response to COM 15 - LS 314
> 
> Thank you for your response to our liaison on OSPFv2 extensions for
> ASON Routing, and we appreciate your comments on
> draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc5787bis-01.txt, in particular your agreement that
> the draft is mature to progress. We also thank Stephen Shew for his
> informal editorial comments, which have been incorporated into the
> draft.
> 
> Regarding the three G.7715.1 requirements listed in the liaison, we
> agree with you that the ASON Routing draft is not the proper place to
> address these requirements. We also note that these requirements
> were not included in RFC 4258. We welcome interested Q14/15 participants
> and/or other individuals to submit a new draft to the IETF to address
> these requirements.
> 
> Regards,
> Deborah and Lou
> IETF CCAMP chairs
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp