Re: [CCAMP] Proposed SG15 Liaison response on LS314

Looks good to me as well.  I was at the Q14 interim meeting where this was discussed and it is a good idea for the IETF to request individuals submit the necessary material in the form of a individual internet draft.

Regards,
-scott. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis
> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 7:37 AM
> To: Ong, Lyndon
> Cc: lear@cisco.com; ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Proposed SG15 Liaison response on LS314
> 
> Deborah, Lou,
> 
> It looks great to me as well.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andy
> 
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Ong, Lyndon <Lyong@ciena.com> wrote:
> > Hi Deborah, Acee,
> >
> > The response looks good to me as well.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Lyndon
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
> > Of Acee Lindem
> > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 9:27 AM
> > To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI)
> > Cc: ccamp@ietf.org; lear@cisco.com
> > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Proposed SG15 Liaison response on LS314
> >
> > Hi Deborah,
> > This looks fine to me. I'd like to note that while the 
> phrase "mature to progress" may sound a bit awkward, this was 
> the exact phasing in the ITU COM 15 - LS 314 - E liaison.
> >
> > Liaison response to request for review of OSPFv2 extensions 
> for ASON 
> > routing submission (ref. TD 552 (WP 3/15)) 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file1235.pdf
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> >
> > On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:30 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI) wrote:
> >
> >> CCAMP,
> >>
> >> Here's a proposed response to SG15. Let us know if any 
> concerns/comments by August 31st.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Deborah and Lou
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >> To: Q14/15
> >> Subject: Response to COM 15 - LS 314
> >>
> >> Thank you for your response to our liaison on OSPFv2 
> extensions for 
> >> ASON Routing, and we appreciate your comments on 
> >> draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc5787bis-01.txt, in particular your 
> agreement that 
> >> the draft is mature to progress. We also thank Stephen 
> Shew for his 
> >> informal editorial comments, which have been incorporated into the 
> >> draft.
> >>
> >> Regarding the three G.7715.1 requirements listed in the 
> liaison, we 
> >> agree with you that the ASON Routing draft is not the 
> proper place to 
> >> address these requirements. We also note that these 
> requirements were 
> >> not included in RFC 4258. We welcome interested Q14/15 
> participants 
> >> and/or other individuals to submit a new draft to the IETF 
> to address 
> >> these requirements.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Deborah and Lou
> >> IETF CCAMP chairs
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CCAMP mailing list
> >> CCAMP@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CCAMP mailing list
> > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CCAMP mailing list
> > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 