IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Proposed SG15 Liaison response on LS314

"Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com> Fri, 19 August 2011 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=12127b6948=lyong@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CC921F8802 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kVJ-Dk6dvdpW for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A2921F8B48 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id p7JGxmkn019032; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:02:54 -0400
Received: from mdwexght01.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-28.ciena.com [63.118.36.28]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id y9su70hkx-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:02:54 -0400
Received: from MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com ([::1]) by MDWEXGHT01.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:02:52 -0400
From: "Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI)" <db3546@att.com>
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:02:52 -0400
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Proposed SG15 Liaison response on LS314
Thread-Index: AcxejM76n08RPZSKTX+4ChJ+g6wvlgABPtlQ
Message-ID: <A0B4FC0A5EFBD44585414760DB4FD2742A04F3AE@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com>
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C802900E@MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com> <66A48D61-D5FB-4282-BA71-1A244BE0FA8E@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <66A48D61-D5FB-4282-BA71-1A244BE0FA8E@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-6.800.1017-18334.000
x-tm-as-result: No--51.898000-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2011-08-19_06:2011-08-19, 2011-08-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1108190166
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "lear@cisco.com" <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Proposed SG15 Liaison response on LS314
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:02:01 -0000

Hi Deborah, Acee,

The response looks good to me as well.

Cheers,

Lyndon



-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 9:27 AM
To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI)
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org; lear@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Proposed SG15 Liaison response on LS314

Hi Deborah,
This looks fine to me. I'd like to note that while the phrase "mature to progress" may sound a bit awkward, this was the exact phasing in the ITU COM 15 - LS 314 - E liaison.

Liaison response to request for review of OSPFv2 extensions for ASON
routing submission (ref. TD 552 (WP 3/15))
https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file1235.pdf

Thanks,
Acee

On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:30 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI) wrote:

> CCAMP,
>
> Here's a proposed response to SG15. Let us know if any concerns/comments by August 31st.
>
> Thanks,
> Deborah and Lou
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> To: Q14/15
> Subject: Response to COM 15 - LS 314
>
> Thank you for your response to our liaison on OSPFv2 extensions for
> ASON Routing, and we appreciate your comments on
> draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc5787bis-01.txt, in particular your agreement that
> the draft is mature to progress. We also thank Stephen Shew for his
> informal editorial comments, which have been incorporated into the
> draft.
>
> Regarding the three G.7715.1 requirements listed in the liaison, we
> agree with you that the ASON Routing draft is not the proper place to
> address these requirements. We also note that these requirements
> were not included in RFC 4258. We welcome interested Q14/15 participants
> and/or other individuals to submit a new draft to the IETF to address
> these requirements.
>
> Regards,
> Deborah and Lou
> IETF CCAMP chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email