Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-15
Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Mon, 12 September 2022 09:34 UTC
Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EB9C14CE45 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 02:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NvOtv_Ln8EUB for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 02:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 398F2C14CE2E for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 02:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MR1bs5z4Jz67Zm0; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:32:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) by fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:34:13 +0200
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.34]) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.34]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.031; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:34:13 +0200
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-15
Thread-Index: AQHYtvf4zB2+pmbemUGwhpr6VGGZHAKvD8AAAAjjV3sANdQIwAAqzlrSADdax3etuwx3oIAAFFuAgAYGNtA=
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:34:13 +0000
Message-ID: <e9e0c19e57bf4325a36a9b706d4fbf1c@huawei.com>
References: <AM8PR07MB8295D0DDCD09B525FBD86621F0719@AM8PR07MB8295.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <39c2dba9bf984e89997b0b06c7264022@huawei.com> <AM7PR07MB6248501EEC18032F6A7B7D3BA07F9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM8PR07MB8295E7525432B613007AC4EDF07E9@AM8PR07MB8295.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM7PR07MB624828ABB8B6B5FF8A1681F2A0419@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM7PR07MB62484A70EAF2DB41F79630F4A0409@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <01d6ceda90604aee9d1d303a276915ea@huawei.com> <AM7PR07MB6248F6C8413B645742C12680A0409@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB6248F6C8413B645742C12680A0409@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.203.246.111]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/CbXlOieebaefZVn2NnL_ppIVbeI>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-15
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:34:20 -0000
Hi Tom, The YANG tree is generated automatically by pyang so I am not sure we can easily insert comments there Please note that every time we change the YANG model we regenerate the YANG tree with pyang so I believe that adding the comments manually would be quite cumbersome Italo > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> > Sent: giovedì 8 settembre 2022 17:30 > To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>; Daniele Ceccarelli > <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>; ccamp@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-15 > > From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> > Sent: 08 September 2022 13:19 > To: tom petch; Daniele Ceccarelli; ccamp@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-15 > > Hi Tom, > > The text in the former comments line have been moved within YANG > description statements which I believe are more correct from a YANG language > perspective <tp> > > Errr no! > > You have 46 pages (no page numbers remember:-( in which you have > comments like > /* > * Augment TE bandwidth > */ > which are helpful in helping me find where I am, What I am saying is that the > tree diagram would be more helpful if it had // Augment TE bandwidth at the > equivalent point in the tree diagram. And if there were as much again > comments in both, then that would be even better. > > Tom Petch > > > Italo > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> > > Sent: giovedì 8 settembre 2022 13:26 > > To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>; Italo Busi > > <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>; ccamp@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-15 > > > > What you could do ... > > > > From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of tom petch > > <ietfc@btconnect.com> > > Sent: 07 September 2022 10:00 > > From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> > > Sent: 06 September 2022 13:33 > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > Thanks for the review. > > > > Few comments from my side: > > > > - There isn't that much that we can do about the structure imposed by > > the TE- topology other than follow the path already established. > > > > <tp2> > > ... is to add comment lines to the tree diagram. Because the YANG is > > almost all uses, I find it hard to see what is happening and so need > > the tree diagram more. I then need to match the YANG module and the > > tree diagram - the former has comment lines (good) the latter does > > not so adding the same comment lines to the tree diagram would make it > > easier to switch between the two and see what is going on. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > - English: unfortunately many of us are non English native speakers, > > but luckily the RFC editor is extremely helpful here. His/her thorough > > review usually leads to well written documents. > > - References: G.709 is already part of the references. > > > > <tp> > > > > Disagree > > In the references I see G.709 March 2020 In the document I see > > G.709/Y.1331 February 2016. > > I cannot see these as the same. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > Thanks > > Daniele > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> > > > Sent: Monday, 5 September 2022 13:02 > > > From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Italo Busi > > > <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> > > > Sent: 05 September 2022 07:35 > > > > > > Hi Daniele, Fatai, > > > > > > As co-author, I think the draft is now ready for publication > > > > > > <tp> > > > Mmm that's a challenge. > > > > > > Indeed it is a challenge to review for the usual reasons, the > > > structure imposed by te-topology, the imports, the uses, the many > > > changes in its history and so on. I tried to match it up with > > > RFC8795 s.6 and failed; I may try again in the next week or two. > > > > > > The English I find flaky, as in mismatch of singular and plural and > > > in some unusual spellings 'Costant Bit Rate' or with 'The > > > client-facing is an indicator' or 'support- client-signal' for 'supported..' > > > > > > More concretely > > > G.709/Y.1331 > > > should be in the I-D references IMO. > > > > > > Tom Petch > > > > > > Thanks, Italo > > > > > > From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> > > > Sent: lunedì 22 agosto 2022 21:00 > > > To: ccamp@ietf.org > > > Subject: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-15 > > > > > > CCAMP, > > > > > > the IPR declaration collection has been successfully completed and > > > we can move to the next step together with draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types. > > > > > > This starts a 2 weeks working group last call on > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang- > > > 15 The last call ends on Monday September 5th. Please send you > > > comments to the CCAMP mailing list. > > > > > > All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been > > > collected and can be found in the history of the document: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang/hist > > > or y/ Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this draft. > > > > > > If interested, please volunteer to be the shepherd of the draft > > > (authors excluded). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Daniele & Fatai > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CCAMP mailing list > > CCAMP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo… Daniele Ceccarelli
- [CCAMP] 答复: WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… Italo Busi
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… tom petch
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… tom petch
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… tom petch
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… Italo Busi
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… tom petch
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… Italo Busi
- Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-… tom petch