Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-14

Hi Haomian,
+1 , option 2 it is better for me too.

Thanks
Sergio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of daniel@olddog.co.uk
> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 1:28 PM
> To: 'Zhenghaomian' <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org; 'Daniele Ceccarelli'
> <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-14
> 
> Hi Haomian,
> 
> Option 2 looks good to me.
> 
> BR, Dan.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
> Sent: 07 October 2022 11:48
> To: daniel@olddog.co.uk
> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org; 'Daniele Ceccarelli'
> <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; 'tom petch'
> <ietfc@btconnect.com>
> Subject: 答复: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-14
> 
> Hi, Daniel, Chairs, WG,
> 
> During the finalization of this work (and otn-topology), we noticed one
> question for your confirmation. It's about how to put the reference of ITU-T
> G.sup43, which specifies the ODU1e, ODU3e1 and ODU3e2. The problems
> are 1) References in YANG models MUST be normative and 2) ITU-T
> supplement can only be informative. After discussion with YANG doctors and
> ADs, we decided to remove the citation of G.sup43 in our YANG models (and
> will do that in the next update).
> 
> Now we are working on the text and need to figure out how to deal with this
> problem, the options are:
> 1) remove referencing the G.sup43 and RFC 7963 from the document.
> 2) remove G.sup43 and RFC7963 only in YANG but keep some text for people
> who may want to use the ODU1e/ODU3e1/ODU3e2. Then the G.sup43 and
> RFC7963 will become informative references.
> 
> We think this is important so we are writing to seek for comments from the
> WG. Authors are preferring option 2) and plan to update by the end of next
> week if there is no strong objections.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Haomian
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 daniel@olddog.co.uk
> 发送时间: 2022年9月7日 17:37
> 收件人: 'tom petch' <ietfc@btconnect.com>
> 抄送: ccamp@ietf.org; 'Daniele Ceccarelli'
> <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> 主题: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-14
> 
> Hi Tom, acknowledged.
> 
> I will shepherd layer1-types and otn-topo-yang and help improve the English,
> fix nits, et al.
> 
> BR, Dan.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
> Sent: 07 September 2022 10:07
> To: daniel@olddog.co.uk; 'Daniele Ceccarelli'
> <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-14
> 
> From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of daniel@olddog.co.uk
> <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
> Sent: 06 September 2022 14:48
> 
> Hi Daniele, WG.
> 
> Re: Anyone volunteering to be the shepherd of the draft?
> 
> I can perform this task.
> 
> Re: English Review
> 
> Although I have a few I-Ds that depend on this work, I never conducted an
> English review. However, I can do an English review this week if the authors
> plan an update post-LC comments.
> 
> <tp>
> Dan
> 
> I did not comment on the English of this I-D because it seems more or less
> ok; it is the otn-topo-yang where I found a significant number of quirks,
> starting with Section 1!  I think I understand it but it is a lot for an RFC Editor
> to correct and at least some of our recent AD have been commenting on the
> English so we may get 50 or more corrections from the IESG review, in which
> case, better we did it first.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> BR, Dan.
> 
> From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
> Sent: 06 September 2022 13:34
> To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>;
> ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-14
> 
> WG,
> 
> The polling is now closed. We'll proceed with submission to the IESG.
> 
> Anyone volunteering to be the shepherd of the draft?
> 
> Thanks
> Daniele
> 
> From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org>>
> On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
> Sent: Monday, 22 August 2022 20:57
> To: ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
> Subject: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-14
> 
> CCAMP,
> 
> the IPR declaration collection has been successfully completed and we can
> move to the next step together with draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang.
> 
> This starts a 2 weeks working group last call on
> draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-14 The last call ends on Monday September
> 5th.
> Please send you comments to the CCAMP mailing list.
> 
> All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected
> and can be found in the history of the document:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types/history/<http
> s://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501cfaf3-313273af-
> 454445554331-25
> 2b10ecd84e1edc&q=1&e=cf4762f0-40d9-412e-945a-
> 00808e166b8e&u=https%3A%2F%2Fda
> tatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types%2Fhistory%2F>
> Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this draft.
> 
> If interested, please volunteer to be the shepherd of the draft (authors
> excluded).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Daniele & Fatai
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp