Re: CCAMP 56 agenda
"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com> Sun, 02 March 2003 20:53 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 12:57:11 -0800
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030302155254.087f36c8@bucket.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:53:29 -0500
To: Adrian Farrel <afarrel@movaz.com>, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: CCAMP 56 agenda
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
>Kireeti, >The following drafts are candidates for discussion... > >GMPLS MIBs >draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-00.txt >draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-00.txt >I am not particularly keen to say anything on this subject, but perhaps the WG >is owed a statement on the progress (or lack of it). Not sure there is a reason to discuss this as part of the agenda other than to say that these MIBs are awaiting updates of the base MPLS MIBs. --Tom >Crankback >draft-iwata-mpls-crankback-05.txt >Would like to get this draft into a WG even though it has more technical >work to >be done. >Rumor has it that inter-area will finally make it onto the CCAMP charter! >The issue of crankback is raised by the ITU in ASON, and this might start to >address their requirements. > >Route exclusion >draft-lee-ccamp-rsvp-te-exclude-route-01.txt >Route exclusion is also, perhaps, ripe for consideration. It has application >both in single and multi-area networks. > >Cheers, >Adrian > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Kireeti Kompella" <kireeti@juniper.net> >To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> >Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:55 AM >Subject: CCAMP 56 agenda > > > > Hi, > > > > If you would like to speak at the CCAMP WG at the 56th IETF, please > > reply to this email -- that will help the chairs track requests. > > Also, please state which Internet draft(s) form the basis of the > > talk that others may come prepared. > > > > Note: these are *not* presentations, expositions, or tutorials. > > A small number of slides that say what has changed *since the > > last IETF*, issues that were raised in the interim, and resolutions > > to those issues is the ideal. If there hasn't been a discussion > > on the mailing list, in many cases that is a sign that the topic > > isn't (yet) ready for prime time. > > > > Thanks, > > Ron and Kireeti. > >
- Re: CCAMP 56 agenda Martin.Vigoureux
- RE: CCAMP 56 agenda Genadi Velev
- Re: CCAMP 56 agenda Peter Czezowski
- Re: CCAMP 56 agenda Zafar Ali
- Re: CCAMP 56 agenda Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: CCAMP 56 agenda Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: CCAMP 56 agenda Kireeti Kompella
- Re: CCAMP 56 agenda Adrian Farrel
- CCAMP 56 agenda Kireeti Kompella