Re: CCAMP 56 agenda

"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com> Sun, 02 March 2003 20:54 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 12:57:04 -0800
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030302155353.087f3550@bucket.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:54:21 -0500
To: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, Adrian Farrel <afarrel@movaz.com>
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: CCAMP 56 agenda
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"

At 09:20 AM 3/2/2003 -0800, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>Hi Adrian (and Tom et al),
>
>On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>
> > The following drafts are candidates for discussion...
> >
> > GMPLS MIBs
> > draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-00.txt
> > draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-00.txt
> > I am not particularly keen to say anything on this subject, but perhaps 
> the WG
> > is owed a statement on the progress (or lack of it).
>
>Can you give us an estimate for when this work would be ready to go to
>WG Last Call?  It would be good to put it explicitly on the milestones.

         The next meeting in Vienna is a good date IMHO.

         --Tom


> > Crankback
> > draft-iwata-mpls-crankback-05.txt
> > Would like to get this draft into a WG even though it has more 
> technical work to
> > be done.
> > Rumor has it that inter-area will finally make it onto the CCAMP charter!
> > The issue of crankback is raised by the ITU in ASON, and this might 
> start to
> > address their requirements.
>
>The charter is currently frozen, but when a certain WG chair behaves
>himself, the discussion will be on.
>
> > Route exclusion
> > draft-lee-ccamp-rsvp-te-exclude-route-01.txt
> > Route exclusion is also, perhaps, ripe for consideration. It has 
> application
> > both in single and multi-area networks.
>
>Noted.
>
>Kireeti.