Re: [CCAMP] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: (with COMMENT)

[Italo Busi <[e-mail]>]

Dear Warren, 

Thank you for the review, the authors have updated the document to address your comments and posted the updated document as draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-17.

Updates include:

- The meaning of "A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types" has been further defined in the document, we don't feel a title change is needed. 
- Expanded acronyms on first use, thank you for the observation. 

Again, thanks for the support and review. 

Authors, Haomian and Italo.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> Sent: mercoledì 13 dicembre 2023 22:17
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: [CCAMP] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-
> types-16: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-
> positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT
> positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I had originally written this up as a DISCUSS ballot, but am submitting it as
> NoObjection instead because Eric and John are holding DISCUSS on this.
> 
> The title is "A YANG Data Model for Layer 1 Types", and this speaks to a
> specific subset of L1 types -- the title really should be updated to clarify
> this. In addition, there are many acronyms that should be expanded.
> 
> 
>