IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] AD Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16

Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Wed, 14 February 2024 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87490C14F70E for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 06:00:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9N4fHBKtmgNC for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 06:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE9AC14F6E3 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 06:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TZfrL5xwsz6J9yF; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 21:56:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.132]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8037E140D1A; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:00:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) by frapeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:00:50 +0100
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:00:50 +0100
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] AD Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16
Thread-Index: AQHaCyMwV88WGn7dMkaPUH4HjO/ey7EKheCg
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:00:50 +0000
Message-ID: <f9f4052c90cf44b78f99d708c1ed3528@huawei.com>
References: <BN2P110MB1107506DF0A4E91E9C5D69BEDCA1A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB1107506DF0A4E91E9C5D69BEDCA1A@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.203.246.111]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/n6YK6j2nAdXj4YejnnOI_4DzmS8>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:00:54 -0000

Dear Roman, 

Thank you for the review, the authors have updated the document to address your comments and posted the updated document as draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-17.

We have added a reference to RFC8294 in table 1

Again, thanks for the support and review. 

Authors, Haomian and Italo.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
> Sent: lunedì 30 ottobre 2023 02:30
> To: ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: [CCAMP] AD Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16 and am taking
> over as responsible AD of this document to help load-balance work in the
> RTG Area.
> 
> Thank you for the work on this document.  The early review by RTGDIR
> (Michael Richardson) and YANGDOCTORS (Rob Wilton) are also appreciated.
> This document is in good shape.  I having no feedback of substance so I'm
> advancing it to IETF LC.
> 
> The only editorial feedback I have is from idnits:
> 
>   == Unused Reference: 'RFC8294' is defined on line 1992, but no explicit
>      reference was found in the text
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email