RE: IESG comments on generalize MPLS documents

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Thu, 29 August 2002 19:27 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:19:47 -0700
Message-ID: <A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC0EC61DC8@nl0006exch003u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@movaz.com>
Cc: "Ccamp-wg (E-mail)" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: IESG comments on generalize MPLS documents
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:27:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

I still have no complete answer from the SEC ADs...
But a start might be document draft-iab-sec-cons-00.txt
specifically sect 4.5.1

Hope this gets you started

Bert 
> > ><draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-07.txt>
> > >
> > >1. This doc says "just use IPsec".  A clearer statement is needed,
> > >    specifying the necessary IPsec selectors (per RFC 2401) and the
> > >    way the cryptographically protected endpoints are related to
> > >    the authorization model, i.e., who can do what.
> > 
> > can you provide an example of what you'd like to see?
> > 
> 
> I am checking with Security ADs. 
>