Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds

Wataru Imajuku <imajuku.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp> Wed, 09 April 2008 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C2428C39D for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eT2VOt2PZWEN for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A0828C385 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1JjOOL-000J7G-Hr for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:42:21 +0000
Received: from [129.60.39.147] (helo=tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <imajuku.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>) id 1JjOOI-000J6o-EI for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:42:20 +0000
Received: from mfs6.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (mfs6.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.149]) by tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m390gFXK019682 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:42:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mfs6.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mfs6.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F886BFB for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:42:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: from dmailsv1.y.ecl.ntt.co.jp (dmailsv1.y.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.53.14]) by mfs6.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6006B9E for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:42:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mailsv14.y.ecl.ntt.co.jp by dmailsv1.y.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.14.2/dmailsv1-2.0) with ESMTP id m390gF5I009600 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:42:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost by mailsv14.y.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.14.1/Lab-1.7) with ESMTP id m390gE6U028177 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:42:15 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20080409001807.06c43b50@mailsv4.y.ecl.ntt.co.jp>
X-Sender: wi002@mailsv4.y.ecl.ntt.co.jp
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J-Jr3
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:47:31 +0900
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
From: Wataru Imajuku <imajuku.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
In-Reply-To: <03cc01c89048$6717b0b0$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
References: <03cc01c89048$6717b0b0$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

 Yes to all.

Best Regards
Wataru

At 05:23 08/03/28, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>Hi,
>
>From Philadelphia, we have four candidate I-Ds for adoption as CCAMP working group documents.
>
>Please express your opinions.
>
>Note that acceptance of these I-Ds does not mean that the discussion about the architecture is done. I think we made some progress on that topic in Philadelphia, and I think the authors took on the task of making some updates of semantics and for clarity, but I expect the discussion may go on for a while.
>
>draft-imajuku-ccamp-ethernet-gmpls-req-01.txt
>draft-fedyk-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te-02.txt
>draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-mef-uni-02.txt
>draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-ether-svcs-01.txt
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian 
>
>

-------------------------------------
Wataru Imajuku@NTT Network Innovation Labs
TEL: +81-46-859-4315
FAX: +81-46-859-5541