RE: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
<alan.mcguire@bt.com> Tue, 08 April 2008 13:04 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E393A6C8D for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDA+VnSta0zK for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526CB3A6879 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1JjDKK-000PNR-9i for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:53:28 +0000
Received: from [217.32.164.151] (helo=smtp4.smtp.bt.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <alan.mcguire@bt.com>) id 1JjDKH-000PMp-KH for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:53:26 +0000
Received: from E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.107]) by smtp4.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:53:23 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:53:22 +0100
Message-ID: <346DD76A8C47FD4A87FA57FD1DEBCC9C028A8144@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <033b01c898cf$ee650830$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
Thread-Index: AciY0DOZ4hoiUpdsSWSqXbCAbNToMAAp0yoA
From: alan.mcguire@bt.com
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2008 12:53:23.0335 (UTC) FILETIME=[877D4170:01C89977]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Yes to all Alan -----Original Message----- From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 07 April 2008 17:54 To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org Subject: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Hi, We have seen some good support for these I-Ds and no objections, but I don't think we have seen anything like the level of support that was evident in the room in Philadelphia. We haven't seen support from more than half of the authors of the documents. So, please, if you haven't already done so, give an indication of whether or not you support each of these four documents becoming working group drafts. Remember, you can be in favor of some and not other if you like. Thanks, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:23 PM Subject: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds > Hi, > > From Philadelphia, we have four candidate I-Ds for adoption as CCAMP > working group documents. > > Please express your opinions. > > Note that acceptance of these I-Ds does not mean that the discussion about > the architecture is done. I think we made some progress on that topic in > Philadelphia, and I think the authors took on the task of making some > updates of semantics and for clarity, but I expect the discussion may go > on for a while. > > draft-imajuku-ccamp-ethernet-gmpls-req-01.txt > draft-fedyk-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te-02.txt > draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-mef-uni-02.txt > draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-ether-svcs-01.txt > > Thanks, > Adrian > > >
- Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Adrian Farrel
- Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Loa Andersson
- RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Nurit Sprecher
- RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds David Allan
- RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Ong, Lyndon
- Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Lou Berger
- RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Diego Caviglia
- RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Don Fedyk
- Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Greg Bernstein
- RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Attila Takacs
- Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Dan Li
- Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Gino Carrozzo
- RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Shah, Himanshu
- Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Tomohiro Otani
- RE: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Pandian, Vijay
- Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Adrian Farrel
- RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Hamid Ould-Brahim
- RE: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds neil.2.harrison
- Re: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Andrew G. Malis
- RE: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds alan.mcguire
- Re: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Ogaki, Kenichi
- Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Wataru Imajuku