Re: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 08 April 2008 09:20 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h+Ej6tnRFg6Wo6TwRukXR/UHFnEf/xau/27e8iLgF6BjsRDTdusDchIn5MOzFlrZmRe3mQS/a44PXlGZ5uNnZjInTFaasVSdHPpTZe4IaQ4Qs86w14+PbgFjsWS4AjqvlUumdjrIswpWo23pFW2R9hXh7GkOlPlsZfXHwGR+W+4=
Message-ID: <8c99930d0804080211w311159a8gceaebebbcbdf1334@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:11:29 -0400
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <033b01c898cf$ee650830$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <03cc01c89048$6717b0b0$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe> <033b01c898cf$ee650830$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

Adrian,

Yes to all.

Cheers,
Andy

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have seen some good support for these I-Ds and no objections, but I don't
> think we have seen anything like the level of support that was evident in
> the room in Philadelphia. We haven't seen support from more than half of the
> authors of the documents.
>
> So, please, if you haven't already done so, give an indication of whether or
> not you support each of these four documents becoming working group drafts.
> Remember, you can be in favor of some and not other if you like.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:23 PM
> Subject: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > From Philadelphia, we have four candidate I-Ds for adoption as CCAMP
> working group documents.
> >
> > Please express your opinions.
> >
> > Note that acceptance of these I-Ds does not mean that the discussion about
> the architecture is done. I think we made some progress on that topic in
> Philadelphia, and I think the authors took on the task of making some
> updates of semantics and for clarity, but I expect the discussion may go on
> for a while.
> >
> > draft-imajuku-ccamp-ethernet-gmpls-req-01.txt
> > draft-fedyk-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te-02.txt
> > draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-mef-uni-02.txt
> > draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-ether-svcs-01.txt
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Adrian Farrel
Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Loa Andersson
RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Nurit Sprecher
RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds David Allan
RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Ong, Lyndon
Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Lou Berger
RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Diego Caviglia
RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Don Fedyk
Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Greg Bernstein
RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Attila Takacs
Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Dan Li
Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Gino Carrozzo
RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Shah, Himanshu
Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Tomohiro Otani
RE: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Pandian, Vijay
Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Adrian Farrel
RE: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Hamid Ould-Brahim
RE: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds neil.2.harrison
Re: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Andrew G. Malis
RE: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds alan.mcguire
Re: Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Ogaki, Kenichi
Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds Wataru Imajuku