[CCAMP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8632 (6866)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 04 March 2022 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92BF3A08D3 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:47:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjDH_B09X_9X for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0CF3A0AA0 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 394CF12EF93; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:47:23 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: reshad@yahoo.com, stefan@wallan.se, mbj@tail-f.com, ccamp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220304164723.394CF12EF93@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:47:23 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/TX6PLm4yyRowp6dlEaFhDIhh52Y>
Subject: [CCAMP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8632 (6866)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 16:47:39 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8632,
"A YANG Data Model for Alarm Management".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6866

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com>

Section: 6

Original Text
-------------
      container older-than {
        presence "Age specification";
        description
          "Matches the 'last-status-change' leaf in the alarm.";
        choice age-spec {


Corrected Text
--------------
      container older-than {
        presence "Age specification";
        description
          "Matches the 'last-changed' leaf in the alarm.";
        choice age-spec {


Notes
-----
There is no last-status-change leaf in alarm (and it seems there never was).

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8632 (draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A YANG Data Model for Alarm Management
Publication Date    : September 2019
Author(s)           : S. Vallin, M. Bjorklund
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG