IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Thu, 08 August 2013 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B87411E823B for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.055
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.055 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.544, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tDh7MQSvl-60 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A95C11E822E for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail106-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.249) by CH1EHSOBE011.bigfish.com (10.43.70.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:15:10 +0000
Received: from mail106-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail106-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB00B401D2 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 2
X-BigFish: PS2(zzzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dc1h1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1fe8h9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail106-ch1: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=jdrake@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(199002)(189002)(63696002)(56816003)(66066001)(77982001)(46102001)(65816001)(79102001)(80022001)(4396001)(76576001)(76786001)(47736001)(51856001)(81342001)(31966008)(59766001)(49866001)(74706001)(83322001)(77096001)(81686001)(47976001)(69226001)(81542001)(50986001)(76176001)(74316001)(76796001)(80976001)(54316002)(54356001)(33646001)(56776001)(74662001)(76482001)(74876001)(74366001)(16406001)(47446002)(53806001)(74502001)(83072001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB144; H:BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.224.36; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail106-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail106-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 13759965094459_5758; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:15:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS035.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.238]) by mail106-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0170200075 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by CH1EHSMHS035.bigfish.com (10.43.70.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:15:08 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB144.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.39.147) by BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.341.1; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:15:08 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.39.144) by BY2PR05MB144.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.39.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.731.16; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:15:05 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.229]) by BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.57]) with mapi id 15.00.0731.000; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:15:05 +0000
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02
Thread-Index: Ac6UeCOcyiZvNP7VTj6v1XoohGG+nw==
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:15:05 +0000
Message-ID: <fef00ba6c7f24978ad08fb60ee929a79@BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.224.36]
x-forefront-prvs: 093290AD39
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Subject: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:15:18 -0000

Hi,

I think there is a basic issue with this draft, which is that the server network manages its own TE metrics and those metrics almost certainly have nothing in common with the TE metrics used in a given client network.

Given this, would it not be better to have policy in the client nodes that maps the characteristics of a given LSP established across the server network into the TE metric to be advertised with that LSP in the client network?

Yours Irrespectively,

John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email